The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Differential Recurrent Neural Networks for Action Recognition
Open accessAbstract
The long short-term memory (LSTM) neural network is capable of processing complex sequential information since it utilizes special gating schemes for learning representations from long input sequences. It has the potential to model any time-series or sequential data, where the current hidden state has to be considered in the context of the past hidden states. This property makes LSTM an ideal choice to learn the complex dynamics of various actions. Unfortunately, the conventional LSTMs do not consider the impact of spatio-temporal dynamics corresponding to the given salient motion patterns, when they gate the information that ought to be memorized through time. To address this problem, we propose a differential gating scheme for the LSTM neural network, which emphasizes on the change in information gain caused by the salient motions between the successive frames. This change in information gain is quantified by Derivative of States (DoS), and thus the proposed LSTM model is termed as differential Recurrent Neural Network (dRNN). We demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed model by automatically recognizing actions from the real-world 2D and 3D human action datasets. Our study is one of the first works towards demonstrating the potential of learning complex time-series representations via high-order derivatives of states.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 · Cited by 102,318
Bidirectional recurrent neural networks
Schuster, M., & Paliwal, K. K. (1997) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/78.650093 · Cited by 10,172
A survey on vision-based human action recognition
Poppe, R. (2010) · Image and Vision Computing · doi:10.1016/j.imavis.2009.11.014 · Cited by 2,242
Cited by
Spatial Temporal Graph Convolutional Networks for Skeleton-Based Action Recognition
Yan, S., Xiong, Y., & Lin, D. (2018) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v32i1.12328 · Cited by 5,410
NTU RGB+D: A Large Scale Dataset for 3D Human Activity Analysis
Shahroudy, A., Liu, J., Ng, T.-T., & Wang, G. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.115 · Cited by 3,148
A New Representation of Skeleton Sequences for 3D Action Recognition
Ke, Q., Bennamoun, M., An, S., Sohel, F., & Boussaid, F. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.486 · Cited by 793
A review of Convolutional-Neural-Network-based action recognition
Yao, G., Lei, T., & Zhong, J. (2019) · Pattern Recognition Letters · doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2018.05.018 · Cited by 437
Decoupling GCN with DropGraph Module for Skeleton-Based Action Recognition
Cheng, K., Zhang, Y., Cao, C., Shi, L., Cheng, J., & Lu, H. (2020) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-58586-0_32 · Cited by 384
Metadata
- Authors
- Veeriah, V., Zhuang, N., & Qi, G.-J.
- Venue
- 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2015-12
- Pages
- 4041-4049
- OpenAlex
- W846669277
- Cited by
- 516
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 24.94
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.