The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Learning Proximal Operators: Using Denoising Networks for Regularizing Inverse Imaging Problems
Open accessAbstract
While variational methods have been among the most powerful tools for solving linear inverse problems in imaging, deep (convolutional) neural networks have recently taken the lead in many challenging benchmarks. A remaining drawback of deep learning approaches is their requirement for an expensive retraining whenever the specific problem, the noise level, noise type, or desired measure of fidelity changes. On the contrary, variational methods have a plug-and-play nature as they usually consist of separate data fidelity and regularization terms. In this paper we study the possibility of replacing the proximal operator of the regularization used in many convex energy minimization algorithms by a denoising neural network. The latter therefore serves as an implicit natural image prior, while the data term can still be chosen independently. Using a fixed denoising neural network in exemplary problems of image deconvolution with different blur kernels and image demosaicking, we obtain state-of-the-art reconstruction results. These indicate the high generalizability of our approach and a reduction of the need for problem-specific training. Additionally, we discuss novel results on the analysis of possible optimization algorithms to incorporate the network into, as well as the choices of algorithm parameters and their relation to the noise level the neural network is trained on.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474
Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift
Ioffe, S., & Szegedy, C. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1502.03167 · Cited by 27,818
Image Super-Resolution Using Deep Convolutional Networks
Dong, C., Loy, C. C., He, K., & Tang, X. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2015.2439281 · Cited by 10,105
Flownet: Learning optical flow with convolutional networks
Dosovitskiy, A., Fischer, P., Ilg, E., Hausser, P., Hazirbas, C., Golkov, V., Smagt, P. V. D., Cremers, D., & Brox, T. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2015.316 · Cited by 4,313
Self-citationPlug-and-Play priors for model based reconstruction
Venkatakrishnan, S. V., Bouman, C. A., & Wohlberg, B. (2013) · 2013 IEEE Global Conference on Signal and Information Processing · doi:10.1109/globalsip.2013.6737048 · Cited by 1,178
The Little Engine That Could: Regularization by Denoising (RED)
Romano, Y., Elad, M., & Milanfar, P. (2017) · SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences · doi:10.1137/16m1102884 · Cited by 934
Plug-and-Play ADMM for Image Restoration: Fixed-Point Convergence and Applications
Chan, S. H., Wang, X., & Elgendy, O. A. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Imaging · doi:10.1109/tci.2016.2629286 · Cited by 904
A Machine Learning Approach for Non-blind Image Deconvolution
Schuler, C. J., Burger, H. C., Harmeling, S., & Scholkopf, B. (2013) · 2013 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2013.142 · Cited by 319
Turning a denoiser into a super-resolver using plug and play priors
Brifman, A., Romano, Y., & Elad, M. (2016) · 2016 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP) · doi:10.1109/icip.2016.7532589 · Cited by 91 · cited 1×
“Poisson denoising [31], bright field electron tomography [36], super-resolution [2], or hyperspectral image sharpening [38].”
Background
Cited by
Deep Learning on Image Denoising: An overview
Tian, C., Fei, L., Zheng, W., Xu, Y., Zuo, W., & Lin, C.-W. (2020) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2020.07.025 · Cited by 1,091
Deep Learning for Handling Kernel/model Uncertainty in Image Deconvolution
Nan, Y., & Ji, H. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.00246 · Cited by 66
Metadata
- Authors
- Meinhardt, T., Moeller, M., Hazirbas, C., & Cremers, D.
- Venue
- 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2017-10
- Pages
- 1799-1808
- OpenAlex
- W2949128855
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 6.71
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Learning Proximal Operators: Using Denoising Networks for Regularizing Inverse Imaging Problems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/iccv.2017.198
- The paper
- Meinhardt, T., Moeller, M., Hazirbas, C., & Cremers, D. (2017). Learning Proximal Operators: Using Denoising Networks for Regularizing Inverse Imaging Problems. 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV). https://doi.org/10.1109/iccv.2017.198
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.