The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Temporal Context Network for Activity Localization in Videos
Open accessAbstract
We present a Temporal Context Network (TCN) for precise temporal localization of human activities. Similar to the Faster-RCNN architecture, proposals are placed at equal intervals in a video which span multiple temporal scales. We propose a novel representation for ranking these proposals. Since pooling features only inside a segment is not sufficient to predict activity boundaries, we construct a representation which explicitly captures context around a proposal for ranking it. For each temporal segment inside a proposal, features are uniformly sampled at a pair of scales and are input to a temporal convolutional neural network for classification. After ranking proposals, non-maximum suppression is applied and classification is performed to obtain final detections. TCN outperforms state-of-the-art methods on the ActivityNet dataset and the THU-MOS14 dataset.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks
Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R., & Sun, J. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2016.2577031 · Cited by 73,472
Action Recognition with Improved Trajectories
Wang, H., & Schmid, C. (2013) · 2013 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/iccv.2013.441 · Cited by 3,407
ActivityNet: A large-scale video benchmark for human activity understanding
Heilbron, F. C., Escorcia, V., Ghanem, B., & Niebles, J. C. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298698 · Cited by 2,578
Object Detection via a Multi-region and Semantic Segmentation-Aware CNN Model
Gidaris, S., & Komodakis, N. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2015.135 · Cited by 801
End-to-End Learning of Action Detection from Frame Glimpses in Videos
Yeung, S., Russakovsky, O., Mori, G., & Fei-Fei, L. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.293 · Cited by 585
A Multi-stream Bi-directional Recurrent Neural Network for Fine-Grained Action Detection
Singh, B., Marks, T. K., Jones, M., Tuzel, O., & Shao, M. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.216 · Cited by 461 · cited 5×
“In [31], a multi-stream RNN was employed along with tracking to generate frame level predictions to which simple grouping was applied at multiple detection thresholds for obtaining detections.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationObject Detection from Video Tubelets with Convolutional Neural Networks
Kang, K., Ouyang, W., Li, H., & Wang, X. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.95 · Cited by 386
Cited by
BMN: Boundary-Matching Network for Temporal Action Proposal Generation
Lin, T., Liu, X., Li, X., Ding, E., & Wen, S. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2019.00399 · Cited by 694
Temporal Deformable Residual Networks for Action Segmentation in Videos
Lei, P., & Todorovic, S. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00705 · Cited by 202
Metadata
- Authors
- Dai, X., Singh, B., Zhang, G., Davis, L. S., & Chen, Y. Q.
- Venue
- 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2017-10
- Pages
- 5727-5736
- OpenAlex
- W2964008341
- Cited by
- 271
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 11.81
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
