Cited by 154Machine Learning and AlgorithmsAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

Active Learning for Deep Detection Neural Networks

Open access
Aghdam, Hamed H., Gonzalez-Garcia, Abel, Lopez, Antonio, Weijer, Joost·2019·2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)

Abstract

The cost of drawing object bounding boxes (i.e. labeling) for millions of images is prohibitively high. For instance, labeling pedestrians in a regular urban image could take 35 seconds on average. Active learning aims to reduce the cost of labeling by selecting only those images that are informative to improve the detection network accuracy. In this paper, we propose a method to perform active learning of object detectors based on convolutional neural networks. We propose a new image-level scoring process to rank unlabeled images for their automatic selection, which clearly outperforms classical scores. The proposed method can be applied to videos and sets of still images. In the former case, temporal selection rules can complement our scoring process. As a relevant use case, we extensively study the performance of our method on the task of pedestrian detection. Overall, the experiments show that the proposed method performs better than random selection.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iccv.2019.00377

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Aggregation of information from multiple sources such as pixel-level, box-level, or image-level has been useful for both uncertainty-based and diversity-based methods.

    “Multiple alternatives include the aggregation of information from multiple sources such as: pixel-level, box-level [45] or image-level [44,47], which have been useful for both uncertainty-based and diversity-based methods”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 30 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aghdam, H. H., Gonzalez-Garcia, A., Lopez, A., & Weijer, J.
Affiliations
  • Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
  • Computer Vision Center (ES)
Venue
2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2019-10
Pages
3671-3679
OpenAlex
W2984303785
Cited by
148
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 1
FWCI
6.70
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) (publishedVersion)
  • Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Algorithms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
active learning (machine learning), object detection, pedestrian detection, convolutional neural networks, video frame selection, annotation cost reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review