Cited by 98Generative Adversarial Networks and Image SynthesisComputer Graphics and Visualization TechniquesDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

Multimodal Style Transfer via Graph Cuts

Open access
Zhang, Yulun, Fang, Chen, Wang, Yilin, Wang, Zhaowen, Lin, Zhe, Fu, Yun, Yang, Jimei·2019·2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)

Abstract

An assumption widely used in recent neural style transfer methods is that image styles can be described by global statics of deep features like Gram or covariance matrices. Alternative approaches have represented styles by decomposing them into local pixel or neural patches. Despite the recent progress, most existing methods treat the semantic patterns of style image uniformly, resulting unpleasing results on complex styles. In this paper, we introduce a more flexible and general universal style transfer technique: multimodal style transfer (MST). MST explicitly considers the matching of semantic patterns in content and style images. Specifically, the style image features are clustered into sub-style components, which are matched with local content features under a graph cut formulation. A reconstruction network is trained to transfer each sub-style and render the final stylized result. We also generalize MST to improve some existing methods. Extensive experiments demonstrate the superior effectiveness, robustness, and flexibility of MST.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iccv.2019.00604

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A universal graph-based style transfer was proposed that transforms multimodal features by matching style patterns with semantic content and appearance, avoiding inflexibility in real-world scenarios.

    “The authors of [159] proposed a universal graph-based style transfer to transform multimodal features by matching style patterns and semantic content and appearance in a way that avoids the lack of flexibility in real-world scenarios.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, Y., Fang, C., Wang, Y., Wang, Z., Lin, Z., Fu, Y., & Yang, J.
Affiliations
  • Northeastern University (US)
  • Adobe Systems (United States) (US)
Venue
2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2019-10
Volume
2019
Pages
5942-5950
OpenAlex
W2990798426
Cited by
98
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2
FWCI
4.51
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • IEEE Conference Proceedings
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design › Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
neural style transfer, graph cuts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review