Cited by 167Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval TechniquesAdvanced Neural Network Applications

Collect and Select: Semantic Alignment Metric Learning for Few-Shot Learning

Open access
Hao, Fusheng, He, Fengxiang, Cheng, Jun, Wang, Lei, Cao, Jianzhong, Tao, Dacheng·2019·2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)

Abstract

Few-shot learning aims to learn latent patterns from few training examples and has shown promises in practice. However, directly calculating the distances between the query image and support image in existing methods may cause ambiguity because dominant objects can locate anywhere on images. To address this issue, this paper proposes a Semantic Alignment Metric Learning (SAML) method for few-shot learning that aligns the semantically relevant dominant objects through a "collect-and-select'' strategy. Specifically, we first calculate a relation matrix (RM) to "`collect" the distances of each local region pairs of the 3D tensor extracted from a query image and the mean tensor of the support images. Then, the attention technique is adapted to "select" the semantically relevant pairs and put more weights on them. Afterwards, a multi-layer perceptron (MLP) is utilized to map the reweighted RMs to their corresponding similarity scores. Theoretical analysis demonstrates the generalization ability of SAML and gives a theoretical guarantee. Empirical results demonstrate that semantic alignment is achieved. Extensive experiments on benchmark datasets validate the strengths of the proposed approach and demonstrate that SAML significantly outperforms the current state-of-the-art methods. The source code is available at https://github.com/haofusheng/SAML.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iccv.2019.00855

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hao, F., He, F., Cheng, J., Wang, L., Cao, J., & Tao, D.
Affiliations
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • Xi'an Institute of Optics and Precision Mechanics (CN)
Venue
2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2019-10
Pages
8459-8468
OpenAlex
W2991559096
Cited by
167
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 7
FWCI
7.39
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Repository of Xi'an Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Xian Institute of Optics and Precision Mechanics) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
few-shot learning, metric learning, semantic alignment, relation matrix, attention mechanism, similarity scores

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review