The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Miss Detection vs. False Alarm: Adversarial Learning for Small Object Segmentation in Infrared Images
Abstract
A key challenge of infrared small object segmentation (ISOS) is to balance miss detection (MD) and false alarm (FA). This usually needs ``opposite'' strategies to suppress the two terms, and has not been well resolved in the literature. In this paper, we propose a deep adversarial learning framework to improve this situation. Departing from the tradition of jointly reducing MD and FA via a single objective, we decompose this difficult task into two sub-tasks handled by two models trained adversarially, with each focusing on reducing either MD or FA. Such a new design brings forth at least three advantages. First, as each model focuses on a relatively simpler sub-task, the overall difficulty of ISOS is somehow decreased. Second, the adversarial training of the two models naturally produces a delicate balance of MD and FA, and low rates for both MD and FA could be achieved at Nash equilibrium. Third, this MD-FA detachment gives us more flexibility to develop specific models dedicated to each sub-task. To realize the above design, we propose a conditional Generative Adversarial Network comprising of two generators and one discriminator. Each generator strives for one sub-task, while the discriminator differentiates the three segmentation results from the two generators and the ground truth. Moreover, in order to better serve the sub-tasks, the two generators, based on context aggregation networks, utilzse different size of receptive fields, providing both local and global views of objects for segmentation. As verified on multiple infrared image data sets, our method consistently achieves better segmentation than many state-of-the-art ISOS methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation
Long, J., Shelhamer, E., & Darrell, T. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298965 · Cited by 38,834
Image-to-Image Translation with Conditional Adversarial Networks
Isola, P., Zhu, J.-Y., Zhou, T., & Efros, A. A. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.632 · Cited by 22,930
Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classification
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2015.123 · Cited by 19,741
Labaca-Castro, R. (2023) · Machine Learning under Malware Attack · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-40442-0_9 · Cited by 19,272
GAN(Generative Adversarial Nets)
(2017) · Journal of Japan Society for Fuzzy Theory and Intelligent Informatics · doi:10.3156/jsoft.29.5_177_2 · Cited by 19,270
A Local Contrast Method for Small Infrared Target Detection
Chen, C. L. P., Li, H., Wei, Y., Xia, T., & Tang, Y. Y. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2013.2242477 · Cited by 1,351
Max-mean and max-median filters for detection of small targets:
Deshpande, S. D., Er, M. H., Venkateswarlu, R., & Chan, P. (1999) · SPIE Proceedings · doi:10.1117/12.364049 · Cited by 853
Dai, Y., & Wu, Y. (2017) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/jstars.2017.2700023 · Cited by 615
Kampffmeyer, M., Salberg, A.-B., & Jenssen, R. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) · doi:10.1109/cvprw.2016.90 · Cited by 605
Small Infrared Target Detection Based on Weighted Local Difference Measure
Deng, H., Sun, X., Liu, M., Ye, C., & Zhou, X. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2016.2538295 · Cited by 398
Cited by
ISNet: Shape Matters for Infrared Small Target Detection
Zhang, M., Zhang, R., Yang, Y., Bai, H., Zhang, J., & Guo, J. (2022) · 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.00095 · Cited by 721
Zhang, T., Li, L., Cao, S., Pu, T., & Peng, Z. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems · doi:10.1109/taes.2023.3238703 · Cited by 486
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, H., Zhou, L., & Wang, L.
- Venue
- 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2019-10
- Pages
- 8508-8517
- OpenAlex
- W3010079414
- Cited by
- 486
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 24.10
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Miss Detection vs. False Alarm: Adversarial Learning for Small Object Segmentation in Infrared Images. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/iccv.2019.00860
- The paper
- Wang, H., Zhou, L., & Wang, L. (2019). Miss Detection vs. False Alarm: Adversarial Learning for Small Object Segmentation in Infrared Images. 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV). https://doi.org/10.1109/iccv.2019.00860
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.