Cited by 520Advanced Neural Network Applications3D Shape Modeling and AnalysisDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

Voxel Transformer for 3D Object Detection

Open access
Mao, Jiageng, Xue, Yujing, Niu, Minzhe, Bai, Haoyue, Feng, Jiashi, Liang, Xiaodan, Xu, Hang, Xu, Chunjing·2021·2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)

Abstract

We present Voxel Transformer (VoTr), a novel and effective voxel-based Transformer backbone for 3D object detection from point clouds. Conventional 3D convolutional backbones in voxel-based 3D detectors cannot efficiently capture large context information, which is crucial for object recognition and localization, owing to the limited receptive fields. In this paper, we resolve the problem by introducing a Transformer-based architecture that enables long-range relationships between voxels by self-attention. Given the fact that non-empty voxels are naturally sparse but numerous, directly applying standard Transformer on voxels is non-trivial. To this end, we propose the sparse voxel module and the submanifold voxel module, which can operate on the empty and non-empty voxel positions effectively. To further enlarge the attention range while maintaining comparable computational overhead to the convolutional counterparts, we propose two attention mechanisms for multi-head attention in those two modules: Local Attention and Dilated Attention, and we further propose Fast Voxel Query to accelerate the querying process in multi-head attention. VoTr contains a series of sparse and submanifold voxel modules, and can be applied in most voxel-based detectors. Our proposed VoTr shows consistent improvement over the convolutional baselines while maintaining computational efficiency on the KITTI dataset and the Waymo Open dataset.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iccv48922.2021.00315

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Point-Painting projects LiDAR point clouds onto output of image semantic segmentation network and concatenates channel activation values with LiDAR intensity values, utilizing image semantic information.

    “Point-Painting [80] projects LiDAR point clouds onto the output of the image semantic segmentation network and concatenates the channel activation values with the LiDAR point cloud intensity values, effectively utilizing image semantic information.”

    From Multimodal fusion and vision–language models: A survey for robot vision (2026) · cites this paper as [80]

    The Related Work section (p. 2) discusses point- and voxel-based detectors, but does not describe Point-Painting. Searches for PointPainting and for LiDAR–image semantic fusion found no passage explaining the claimed projection or concatenation of values. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [2][2] Nicolas Carion, Francisco Massa, Gabriel Synnaeve, Nicolas Usunier, Alexander Kirillov, and Sergey Zagoruyko. End-toend object detection with transformers. In European Conference on Computer Vision , pages 213-229. Springer, 2020. 2, 3 -
  2. [3][3] Qi Chen, Lin Sun, Ernest Cheung, and Alan L Yuille. Every view counts: Cross-view consistency in 3d object detection with hybrid-cylindrical-spherical voxelization. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 33, 2020. 7 -
  3. [14][14] Ming Liang, Bin Yang, Shenlong Wang, and Raquel Urtasun. Deep continuous fusion for multi-sensor 3d object detection. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) , pages 641-656, 2018. 7 -
  4. [23][23] Charles R Qi, Wei Liu, Chenxia Wu, Hao Su, and Leonidas J Guibas. Frustum pointnets for 3d object detection from rgbd data. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages 918-927, 2018. 7 -
  5. [24][24] Charles R Qi, Hao Su, Kaichun Mo, and Leonidas J Guibas. Pointnet: Deep learning on point sets for 3d classification and segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages 652-660, 2017. 1 -
  6. [43][43] Yin Zhou, Pei Sun, Yu Zhang, Dragomir Anguelov, Jiyang Gao, Tom Ouyang, James Guo, Jiquan Ngiam, and Vijay Vasudevan. End-to-end multi-view fusion for 3d object detection in lidar point clouds. In Conference on Robot Learning , pages 923-932. PMLR, 2020. 7 -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mao, J., Xue, Y., Niu, M., Bai, H., Feng, J., Liang, X., Xu, H., & Xu, C.
Affiliations
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
  • Huawei Technologies (China) (CN)
  • Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HK)
  • Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
  • Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications (CN)
Venue
2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2021-10
Pages
3144-3153
OpenAlex
W3204896784
Cited by
520
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 61 · 2025: 114 · 2024: 129 · 2023: 146 · 2022: 68 · 2021: 2
FWCI
28.21
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
3D object detection, point clouds, transformer backbone, self-attention, local attention, long-range context modeling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review