Cited by 74Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsHuman Pose and Action RecognitionAdvanced Neural Network Applications

Target Adaptive Context Aggregation for Video Scene Graph Generation

Open access
Teng, Yao, Wang, Limin, Li, Zhifeng, Wu, Gangshan·2021·2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)

Abstract

This paper deals with a challenging task of video scene graph generation (VidSGG), which could serve as a structured video representation for high-level understanding tasks. We present a new detect-to-track paradigm for this task by decoupling the context modeling for relation prediction from the complicated low-level entity tracking. Specifically, we design an efficient method for frame-level VidSGG, termed as Target Adaptive Context Aggregation Network (TRACE), with a focus on capturing spatio-temporal context information for relation recognition. Our TRACE framework streamlines the VidSGG pipeline with a modular design, and presents two unique blocks of Hierarchical Relation Tree (HRTree) construction and Target-adaptive Context Aggregation. More specific, our HRTree first provides an adpative structure for organizing possible relation candidates efficiently, and guides context aggregation module to effectively capture spatio-temporal structure information. Then, we obtain a contextualized feature representation for each relation candidate and build a classification head to recognize its relation category. Finally, we provide a simple temporal association strategy to track TRACE detected results to yield the video-level VidSGG. We perform experiments on two VidSGG benchmarks: ImageNet-VidVRD and Action Genome, and the results demonstrate that our TRACE achieves the state-of-the-art performance. The code and models are made available at https://github.com/MCG-NJU/TRACE.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iccv48922.2021.01343

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Aligning a sequence of instructions to a video of someone carrying out a task is an example of a powerful pretraining pretext task.

    “Aligning a sequence of instructions to a video of someone carrying out a task is an example of a powerful pretraining pretext task [7], [156].”

    From Multimodal learning with transformers: A survey (2023) · cites this paper as [156]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Teng, Y., Wang, L., Li, Z., & Wu, G.
Affiliations
  • Nanjing University (CN)
  • Tencent (China) (CN)
Venue
2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2021-10
Pages
13668-13677
OpenAlex
W3193902142
Cited by
74
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 7
FWCI
3.92
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China
  • Tencent
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Human Pose and Action Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
relation prediction, context aggregation, spatio-temporal context, entity tracking, temporal association, traces

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review