Cited by 97Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques

From General to Specific: Informative Scene Graph Generation via Balance Adjustment

Open access
Guo, Yuyu, Gao, Lianli, Wang, Xuanhan, Hu, Yuxuan, Xu, Xing, Lu, Xu, Shen, Heng Tao, Song, Jingkuan·2021·2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)

Abstract

The scene graph generation (SGG) task aims to detect visual relationship triplets, i.e., subject, predicate, object, in an image, providing a structural vision layout for scene understanding. However, current models are stuck in common predicates, e.g., "on" and "at", rather than informative ones, e.g., "standing on" and "looking at", resulting in the loss of precise information and overall performance. If a model only uses "stone on road" rather than "blocking" to describe an image, it is easy to misunderstand the scene. We argue that this phenomenon is caused by two key imbalances between informative predicates and common ones, i.e., semantic space level imbalance and training sample level imbalance. To tackle this problem, we propose BA-SGG, a simple yet effective SGG framework based on balance adjustment but not the conventional distribution fitting. It integrates two components: Semantic Adjustment (SA) and Balanced Predicate Learning (BPL), respectively for adjusting these imbalances. Benefited from the model-agnostic process, our method is easily applied to the state-of-the-art SGG models and significantly improves the SGG performance. Our method achieves 14.3%, 8.0%, and 6.1% higher Mean Recall (mR) than that of the Transformer model at three scene graph generation sub-tasks on Visual Genome, respectively. Codes are publicly available1.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iccv48922.2021.01607

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A large amount of recent attempts study how to use as unified as possible pipelines to handle various modalities and multimodal tasks.

    “A large amount of recent attempts [117], [296], [297], [298] study how to use as unified as possible pipelines to handle various modalities and multimodal tasks.”

    From Multimodal learning with transformers: A survey (2023) · cites this paper as [297]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guo, Y., Gao, L., Wang, X., Hu, Y., Xu, X., Lu, X., Shen, H. T., & Song, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (CN)
  • Southwest University (CN)
  • Kuaishou,China
Venue
2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2021-10
Pages
16363-16372
OpenAlex
W3196936439
Cited by
97
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 1
FWCI
6.21
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
Keywords
scene graph generation, visual relationship detection, scene understanding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review