Cited by 310Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsMultimodal Machine Learning Applications

SegGPT: Towards Segmenting Everything In Context

Wang, Xinlong, Zhang, Xiaosong, Cao, Yue, Wang, Wen, Shen, Chunhua, Huang, Tiejun·2023·2023 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)

Abstract

We present SegGPT, a generalist model for segmenting everything in context. We unify various segmentation tasks into a generalist in-context learning framework that accommodates different kinds of segmentation data by transforming them into the same format of images. The training of SegGPT is formulated as an in-context coloring problem with random color mapping for each data sample. The objective is to accomplish diverse tasks according to the context, rather than relying on specific colors. After training, SegGPT can perform arbitrary segmentation tasks in images or videos via in-context inference, such as object instance, stuff, part, contour, and text. SegGPT is evaluated on a broad range of tasks, including few-shot semantic segmentation, video object segmentation, semantic segmentation, and panoptic segmentation. Our results show strong capabilities in segmenting in-domain and out-of-domain targets, either qualitatively or quantitatively.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iccv51070.2023.00110

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In-context learning models are computationally efficient and can adapt their predictions based on a small support set.

    “Unlike previous approaches, that rely on training CNNs [29] or computationally expensive atlas-based registration methods as reverse classifiers [5], [28], in-context learning models are computationally efficient and can adapt their predictions based on a small support set.”

    From ConfIC-RCA: Statistically Grounded Efficient Estimation of Segmentation Quality (2025) · cites this paper as [9]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, X., Zhang, X., Cao, Y., Wang, W., Shen, C., & Huang, T.
Affiliations
  • Beijing Academy of Artificial Intelligence (CN)
  • Zhejiang University (CN)
  • Peking University (CN)
Venue
2023 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2023-10-01
Pages
1130-1140
OpenAlex
W4390873795
Cited by
310
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 63 · 2025: 148 · 2024: 88 · 2023: 11
FWCI
54.93
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
Keywords
in-context learning, part segmentation, contour segmentation, text segmentation, video object segmentation, panoptic segmentation, few-shot semantic segmentation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review