CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 117Medical Image Segmentation TechniquesDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningAdvanced Neural Network Applications

SAM-Med3D: Towards General-purpose Segmentation Models for Volumetric Medical Images

Open access
Wang, Haoyu, Guo, Sizheng, Ye, Jin, Deng, Zhongying, Cheng, Junlong, Li, Tianbin, Chen, Jianpin, Su, Yanzhou +6 more·2023·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2310.15161arXiv 2310.15161
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Existing volumetric medical image segmentation models are typically task-specific, excelling at specific target but struggling to generalize across anatomical structures or modalities. This limitation restricts their broader clinical use. In this paper, we introduce SAM-Med3D for general-purpose segmentation on volumetric medical images. Given only a few 3D prompt points, SAM-Med3D can accurately segment diverse anatomical structures and lesions across various modalities. To achieve this, we gather and process a large-scale 3D medical image dataset, SA-Med3D-140K, from a blend of public sources and licensed private datasets. This dataset includes 22K 3D images and 143K corresponding 3D masks. Then SAM-Med3D, a promptable segmentation model characterized by the fully learnable 3D structure, is trained on this dataset using a two-stage procedure and exhibits impressive performance on both seen and unseen segmentation targets. We comprehensively evaluate SAM-Med3D on 16 datasets covering diverse medical scenarios, including different anatomical structures, modalities, targets, and zero-shot transferability to new/unseen tasks. The evaluation shows the efficiency and efficacy of SAM-Med3D, as well as its promising application to diverse downstream tasks as a pre-trained model. Our approach demonstrates that substantial medical resources can be utilized to develop a general-purpose medical AI for various potential applications. Our dataset, code, and models are available at https://github.com/uni-medical/SAM-Med3D.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2310.15161

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most promptable medical segmentation methods are still developed and evaluated around clean-prompt protocols.

    “Most promptable medical segmentation methods, however, are still developed and evaluated around clean-prompt protocols.”

    From Correction-aware interactive 3D tumor segmentation with sparse and revisable prompts (2026) · cites this paper as [29]

    Section 4.3 (page unavailable) evaluates SAM, SAM-Med2D, and SAM-Med3D using a point sampled from the target foreground, followed by points sampled from prediction-error regions. This supports the clean-prompt characterization of that evaluation, but the paper does not establish that most promptable medical segmentation methods are developed and evaluated under such protocols. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • 3DSAM-Adapter and SAM-Med3D adapt SAM-style prompting to 3D medical images, while ProMISe is a prompt-driven 3D medical segmentation method based on pretrained image foundation models.

    “3DSAM-Adapter [5] and SAM-Med3D [29] adapt SAM-style prompting to 3D medical images, while ProMISe [17] is a prompt-driven 3D medical segmenta-tion method based on pretrained image foundation models.”

    From Correction-aware interactive 3D tumor segmentation with sparse and revisable prompts (2026) · cites this paper as [29]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 30 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Baid, U., Ghodasara, S., Bilello, M., Mohan, S., Calabrese, E., Colak, E., Farahani, K., Kalpathy-Cramer, J., Kitamura, F.C., Pati, S., Prevedello, L.M., Rudie, J.D., Sako, C., Shinohara, R.T., Bergquist, T., Chai, R., Eddy, J.A., Elliott, J., Reade, W., Schaffter, T., Yu, T., Zheng, J., Annotators, B., Davatzikos, C., Mongan, J., Hess, C., Cha, S., Villanueva-Meyer, J.E., Freymann, J.B., Kirby, J.S., Wiestler, B., Crivellaro, P., Colen, R.R., Kotrotsou, A., Marcus, D.S., Milchenko, M., Naz- eri, A., Fathallah-Shaykh, H.M., Wiest, R., Jakab, A., Weber, M., Mahajan, A., Menze, B.H., Flanders, A.E., Bakas, S.: The RSNA-ASNR-MICCAI brats 2021 benchmark on brain tumor segmentation and radiogenomic classification. CoRR abs/2107.02314 (2021), https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.02314 · arXiv
  2. Cheng, J., Ye, J., Deng, Z., Chen, J., Li, T., Wang, H., Su, Y., Huang, Z., Chen, J., Jiang, L., et al.: Sam-med2d. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.16184 (2023) · arXiv
  3. Du, Y., Bai, F., Huang, T., Zhao, B.: Segvol: Universal and interactive volumetric medical image segmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.13385 (2023) · arXiv
  4. Huang, Z., Wang, H., Deng, Z., Ye, J., Su, Y., Sun, H., He, J., Gu, Y., Gu, L., Zhang, S., et al.: Stu-net: Scalable and transferable medical image segmen- tation models empowered by large-scale supervised pre-training. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.06716 (2023) · arXiv
  5. Ji, Y., Bai, H., Yang, J., Ge, C., Zhu, Y., Zhang, R., Li, Z., Zhang, L., Ma, W., Wan, X., et al.: Amos: A large-scale abdominal multi-organ benchmark for versatile medical image segmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.08023 (2022) · arXiv
  6. Kirillov, A., Mintun, E., Ravi, N., Mao, H., Rolland, C., Gustafson, L., Xiao, T., Whitehead, S., Berg, A.C., Lo, W.Y., et al.: Segment anything. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.02643 (2023) · arXiv
  7. Landman, B., Xu, Z., Igelsias, J., Styner, M., Langerak, T., Klein, A.: Miccai multi- atlas labeling beyond the cranial vault-workshop and challenge. In: Proc. MICCAI Multi-Atlas Labeling Beyond Cranial Vault-Workshop Challenge. vol. 5, p. 12 (2015)
  8. Lei, W., Wei, X., Zhang, X., Li, K., Zhang, S.: Medlsam: Localize and segment anything model for 3d medical images. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.14752 (2023) · arXiv
  9. Wang, C., Li, D., Wang, S., Zhang, C., Wang, Y., Liu, Y., Yang, G.: Sammed: A medical image annotation framework based on large vision model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.05617 (2023) · arXiv
  10. Wu, J., Fu, R., Fang, H., Liu, Y., Wang, Z., Xu, Y., Jin, Y., Arbel, T.: Medical sam adapter: Adapting segment anything model for medical image segmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.12620 (2023) · arXiv
  11. Yang, T., Zhu, Y., Xie, Y., Zhang, A., Chen, C., Li, M.: Aim: Adapting image mod- els for efficient video action recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.03024 (2023) · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Wang, H., Guo, S., Ye, J., Deng, Z., Cheng, J., Li, T., Chen, J., Su, Y., Huang, Z., Shen, Y., Fu, B., Zhang, S., He, J., & Qiao, Y.
Affiliations
  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
He, Junjun
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2023
Pages
51-67
ISSN
0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2310.15161
arXiv
2310.15161
OpenAlex
W4410838785
Cited by
115
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 50 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 5
FWCI
82.55
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
3D medical image segmentation, Segment Anything Model, cross-modal generalization, zero-shot transfer, pre-trained segmentation models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review