Algebraically rigorous quaternion framework for the neural network pose estimation problem
Abstract
The 3D pose estimation problem - aligning pairs of noisy 3D point clouds - is a problem with a wide variety of real-world applications. Here we focus on the use of quaternion-based neural network approaches to this problem and apparent anomalies that have arisen in previous efforts to resolve them. In addressing these anomalies, we draw heavily from the extensive literature on closed-form methods to solve this problem. We suggest that the major concerns that have been put forward could be resolved using a simple multi-valued training target derived from rigorous theoretical properties of the rotation-to-quaternion map of Bar-Itzhack. This multi-valued training target is then demonstrated to have good performance for both simulated and ModelNet targets. We provide a comprehensive theoretical context, using the quaternion adjugate, to confirm and establish the necessity of replacing single-valued quaternion functions by quaternions treated in the extended domain of multiple-charted manifolds.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The quaternion adjugate is a higher-order representation that resolves these discontinuities.
“Instead, we regress the quaternion adjugate, a higher-order representation that resolves these discontinuities [34].”
From Rapid patient-specific neural networks for intraoperative X-ray to volume registration (2025) · cites this paper as [34]
Higher-dimensional alternatives (d>5) have theoretical advantages.
“This has motivated the development of several higher-dimensional (d>5) alternatives with theoretical advantages [32, 40, 57].”
From Intraoperative 2D/3D Image Registration via Differentiable X-Ray Rendering (2024) · cites this paper as [32]
Higher-dimensional parameterizations of SO(3) have been proposed that do not suffer from discontinuities.
“In point cloud registration, higher-dimensional parameterizations of SO(3) have been proposed that do not suffer from this issue [32, 40, 57].”
From Intraoperative 2D/3D Image Registration via Differentiable X-Ray Rendering (2024) · cites this paper as [32]
Cites
V2X-ViT: Vehicle-to-Everything Cooperative Perception with Vision Transformer
Xu, R., Xiang, H., Tu, Z., Xia, X., Yang, M.-H., & Ma, J. (2022) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-19842-7_7 · Cited by 584 · see citing works
Carlone, L., Tron, R., Daniilidis, K., & Dellaert, F. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) · doi:10.1109/icra.2015.7139836 · Cited by 237 · see citing works
A Smooth Representation of Belief over SO(3) for Deep Rotation Learning with Uncertainty
Peretroukhin, V., Giamou, M., Nicholas Greene, W., Rosen, D., Kelly, J., & Roy, N. (2020) · Robotics: Science and Systems XVI · doi:10.15607/rss.2020.xvi.007 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Intraoperative 2D/3D Image Registration via Differentiable X-Ray Rendering
Gopalakrishnan, V., Dey, N., & Golland, P. (2024) · 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.01108 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Rapid patient-specific neural networks for intraoperative X-ray to volume registration
Gopalakrishnan, V., Chlorogiannis, D.-D., Abumoussa, A., Larson, A. M., Haouchine, N., Orbach, D. B., Frisken, S., Dey, N., & Golland, P. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.16309 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lin, C., Hanson, A. J., & Hanson, S. M.
- Affiliations
- Flatiron Institute (US)
- Indiana University Bloomington (US)
- Venue
- 2023 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2023-10-01
- Pages
- 14051-14060
- OpenAlex
- W4390872542
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4
- FWCI
- 1.91
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Algebraic and Geometric Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
- Keywords
- 3D pose estimation, quaternion-valued neural networks, point cloud registration, rotation representation, ModelNet
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review