Cited by 237Robotics and Sensor-Based LocalizationTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor NetworksInertial Sensor and Navigation

Initialization techniques for 3D SLAM: A survey on rotation estimation and its use in pose graph optimization

Carlone, Luca, Tron, Roberto, Daniilidis, Kostas, Dellaert, Frank·2015·2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)

Abstract

Pose graph optimization is the non-convex optimization problem underlying pose-based Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM). If robot orientations were known, pose graph optimization would be a linear least-squares problem, whose solution can be computed efficiently and reliably. Since rotations are the actual reason why SLAM is a difficult problem, in this work we survey techniques for 3D rotation estimation. Rotation estimation has a rich history in three scientific communities: robotics, computer vision, and control theory. We review relevant contributions across these communities, assess their practical use in the SLAM domain, and benchmark their performance on representative SLAM problems (Fig. 1). We show that the use of rotation estimation to bootstrap iterative pose graph solvers entails significant boost in convergence speed and robustness.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icra.2015.7139836

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 37 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carlone, L., Tron, R., Daniilidis, K., & Dellaert, F.
Affiliations
  • Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Venue
2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2015-05
Pages
4597-4604
ISSN
1050-4729 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1536617987
Cited by
237
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 5
FWCI
32.95
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • SMARTech Repository (Georgia Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Target Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Inertial Sensor and Navigation
Keywords
3D rotation estimation, pose graph optimization, SLAM, non-convex optimization, robot orientation, convergence rate, robustness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review