The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
CRN: Camera Radar Net for Accurate, Robust, Efficient 3D Perception
Open accessAbstract
Autonomous driving requires an accurate and fast 3D perception system that includes 3D object detection, tracking, and segmentation. Although recent low-cost camera-based approaches have shown promising results, they are susceptible to poor illumination or bad weather conditions and have a large localization error. Hence, fusing camera with low-cost radar, which provides precise long-range measurement and operates reliably in all environments, is promising but has not yet been thoroughly investigated. In this paper, we propose Camera Radar Net (CRN), a novel camera-radar fusion framework that generates a semantically rich and spatially accurate bird’s-eye-view (BEV) feature map for various tasks. To overcome the lack of spatial information in an image, we transform perspective view image features to BEV with the help of sparse but accurate radar points. We further aggregate image and radar feature maps in BEV using multi-modal deformable attention designed to tackle the spatial misalignment between inputs. CRN with real-time setting operates at 20 FPS while achieving comparable performance to LiDAR detectors on nuScenes, and even outperforms at a far distance on 100m setting. Moreover, CRN with offline setting yields 62.4% NDS, 57.5% mAP on nuScenes test set and ranks first among all camera and camera-radar 3D object detectors.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“CRN [101] uses Radar-Assisted View Transformation (RVT) to align camera and radar features in BEV and applies multimodal deformable cross-attention (MDCA) for precise fusion.”
From Multimodal fusion and vision–language models: A survey for robot vision (2026) · cites this paper as [101]
Citations
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474
Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detection
Lin, T.-Y., Dollar, P., Girshick, R., He, K., Hariharan, B., & Belongie, S. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.106 · Cited by 30,939
Focal Loss for Dense Object Detection
Lin, T.-Y., Goyal, P., Girshick, R., He, K., & Dollar, P. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2017.324 · Cited by 30,581
The pascal visual object classes (VOC) challenge
Everingham, M., Van Gool, L., Williams, C. K. I., Winn, J., & Zisserman, A. (2010) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-009-0275-4 · Cited by 19,599
Liu, Z., Mao, H., Wu, C.-Y., Feichtenhofer, C., Darrell, T., & Xie, S. (2022) · 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.01167 · Cited by 8,494
nuScenes: A Multimodal Dataset for Autonomous Driving
Caesar, H., Bankiti, V., Lang, A. H., Vora, S., Liong, V. E., Xu, Q., Krishnan, A., Pan, Y., Baldan, G., & Beijbom, O. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.01164 · Cited by 7,152
FCOS: Fully Convolutional One-Stage Object Detection
Tian, Z., Shen, C., Chen, H., & He, T. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2019.00972 · Cited by 7,013
PointPillars: Fast Encoders for Object Detection From Point Clouds
Lang, A. H., Vora, S., Caesar, H., Zhou, L., Yang, J., & Beijbom, O. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.01298 · Cited by 4,673
KPConv: Flexible and Deformable Convolution for Point Clouds
Thomas, H., Qi, C. R., Deschaud, J., Marcotegui, B., Goulette, F., & Guibas, L. J. (2019) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2019.00651 · Cited by 3,400
SECOND: Sparsely Embedded Convolutional Detection
Yan, Y., Mao, Y., & Li, B. (2018) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s18103337 · Cited by 3,352
Research works printed but not linked: 16
- Chaabane, Deft: Detection embeddings for tracking
- Continental ARS 408-21 Datasheet
- Fischer, Cc-3dt: Panoramic 3d object tracking via cross-camera fusion, 2294
- Johnson, 1992, Array signal processing: concepts and techniques.
- Kim, Low-level sensor fusion network for 3d vehicle detection using radar range-azimuth heatmap and monocular image, 388
- Li, Unifying voxel-based representation with transformer for 3d object detection
- 10.1007/978-3-031-20077-9_1 · DOI · Paper page
- Liang, Bevfusion: A simple and robust lidar-camera fusion framework
- Loshchilov, Decoupled weight decay regularization
- Meyer, Automotive radar dataset for deep learning based 3d object detection, 129
- Park, Time will tell: New outlooks and a baseline for temporal multi-view 3d object detection
- Qi, Pointnet: Deep learning on point sets for 3d classification and segmentation, 652
- Qi, Pointnet++: Deep hierarchical feature learning on point sets in a metric space, 5105
- Roh, Sparse detr: Efficient end-to-end object detection with learnable sparsity
- Vaswani, Attention is all you need, 6000
- Zhu, Deformable detr: Deformable transformers for end-to-end object detection
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Yao, S., Guan, R., Huang, X., Li, Z., Sha, X., Yue, Y., Lim, E. G., Seo, H., Man, K. L., Zhu, X., et al. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles · doi:10.1109/tiv.2023.3307157 · Cited by 312
RCBEVDet: Radar-Camera Fusion in Bird's Eye View for 3D Object Detection
Lin, Z., Liu, Z., Xia, Z., Wang, X., Wang, Y., Qi, S., Dong, Y., Dong, N., Zhang, L., & Zhu, C. (2024) · 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.01414 · Cited by 153
LXL: LiDAR Excluded Lean 3D Object Detection With 4D Imaging Radar and Camera Fusion
Xiong, W., Liu, J., Huang, T., Han, Q., Xia, Y., & Zhu, B. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles · doi:10.1109/tiv.2023.3321240 · Cited by 141
A Review of Multi-Sensor Fusion in Autonomous Driving
Qian, H., Wang, M., Zhu, M., & Wang, H. (2025) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s25196033 · Cited by 123
Exploring Radar Data Representations in Autonomous Driving: A Comprehensive Review
Yao, S., Guan, R., Peng, Z., Xu, C., Shi, Y., Ding, W., Lim, E. G., Yue, Y., Seo, H., Man, K. L., et al. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2025.3554781 · Cited by 100
Metadata
- Authors
- Kim, Y., Shin, J., Kim, S., Lee, I.-J., Choi, J. W., & Kum, D.
- Affiliations
- KAIST
- Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KR)
- Hanyang University (KR)
- Venue
- 2023 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2023-10-01
- Pages
- 17569-17580
- OpenAlex
- W4390872227
- Cited by
- 155
- References
- 62
- Citations by year
- 2026: 45 · 2025: 64 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 9
- FWCI
- 48.24
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Research Foundation of Korea
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Vision and Imaging
- Keywords
- radar-camera fusion, 3D object detection, autonomous driving, low-cost radar, sparse point clouds, semantic segmentation, object tracking, real-time perception, nuScenes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review