Cited by 225AI in cancer detectionCell Image Analysis TechniquesDigital Imaging for Blood Diseases

CGC-Net: Cell Graph Convolutional Network for Grading of Colorectal Cancer Histology Images

Open access
Zhou, Yanning, Graham, Simon, Alemi Koohbanani, Navid, Shaban, Muhammad, Heng, Pheng-Ann, Rajpoot, Nasir·2019·2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision Workshop (ICCVW)

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) grading is typically carried out by assessing the degree of gland formation within histology images. To do this, it is important to consider the overall tissue micro-environment by assessing the cell-level information along with the morphology of the gland. However, current automated methods for CRC grading typically utilise small image patches and therefore fail to incorporate the entire tissue micro-architecture for grading purposes. To overcome the challenges of CRC grading, we present a novel cell-graph convolutional neural network (CGC-Net) that converts each large histology image into a graph, where each node is represented by a nucleus within the original image and cellular interactions are denoted as edges between these nodes according to node similarity. The CGC-Net utilises nuclear appearance features in addition to the spatial location of nodes to further boost the performance of the algorithm. To enable nodes to fuse multi-scale information, we introduce Adaptive GraphSage, which is a graph convolution technique that combines multi-level features in a data-driven way. Furthermore, to deal with redundancy in the graph, we propose a sampling technique that removes nodes in areas of dense nuclear activity. We show that modeling the image as a graph enables us to effectively consider a much larger image (around 16× larger) than traditional patch-based approaches and model the complex structure of the tissue micro-environment. We construct cell graphs with an average of over 3,000 nodes on a large CRC histology image dataset and report state-of-the-art results as compared to recent patch-based as well as contextual patch-based techniques, demonstrating the effectiveness of our method.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iccvw.2019.00050

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • MeSH terms may be used to construct a drug-disease graph, from which latent representations of drugs and diseases are learned using graph embedding algorithms including DeepWalk and LINE.

    “For instance, Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms may be used to construct a drug-disease graph, from which latent representations of drugs and diseases are learned using various graph embedding algorithms, including DeepWalk and LINE (Section 2.1) [178].”

    From Graph representation learning in biomedicine and healthcare (2022) · cites this paper as [178]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 56 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Michaël Defferrard, Xavier Bresson, and Pierre Van- dergheynst. Convolutional Neural Networks on Graphs with Fast Localized Spectral Filtering. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems.
  2. Shi Jun, Wang Ruoyu, Zheng Yushan, Jiang Zhiguo, and Yu Lanlan. Graph convolutional networks for cervical cell classification. https://openreview.net/pdf?id= S1gX_tlc-S.
  3. Stephen J Keenan, James Diamond, W Glenn McCluggage, Hoshang Bharucha, Deborah Thompson, Peter H Bartels, and Peter W Hamilton. An automated machine vision system for the histological grading of cervical intraepithelial neopla- sia (cin). The Journal of Pathology, 192(3):351-362, 2000.
  4. Adam Paszke, Sam Gross, Soumith Chintala, Gregory Chanan, Edward Yang, Zachary DeVito, Zeming Lin, Alban Desmaison, Luca Antiga, and Adam Lerer. Automatic dif- ferentiation in PyTorch. In NIPS Autodiff Workshop, 2017.
  5. Bulent Yener. Cell-graphs: image-driven modeling of structure-function relationship. Communications of the ACM, 60(1):74-84, 2016.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhou, Y., Graham, S., Alemi Koohbanani, N., Shaban, M., Heng, P.-A., & Rajpoot, N.
Affiliations
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • University of Warwick (GB)
Venue
2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision Workshop (ICCVW)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2019-10
Pages
388-398
ISSN
2473-9936 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2971692138
Cited by
225
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 1
FWCI
7.39
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • University of Warwick
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong
  • Medical Research Council (MR/P015476/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Cell Image Analysis Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Imaging for Blood Diseases
Keywords
histological image analysis, graph-based image representation, gland formation, multi-scale feature fusion, node sampling, nuclear features

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review