Cited by 2Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsHuman Pose and Action RecognitionGenerative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis

STORM: Token-Efficient Long Video Understanding for Multimodal LLMs

Jiang, Jindong, Li, Xiuyu, Liu, Zhijian, Li, Muyang, Chen, Guo, Li, Zhiqi, Huang, De-An, Liu, Guilin +8 more·2025·2025 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops (ICCVW)

Abstract

Recent advances in video-based multimodal large language models (Video-LLMs) have significantly improved video understanding by processing videos as sequences of image frames. However, many existing methods treat frames independently in the vision backbone, lacking explicit temporal modeling, which limits their ability to capture dynamic patterns and efficiently handle long videos. To address these limitations, we introduce STORM (Spatiotemporal TOken Reduction for Multimodal LLMs), a novel architecture incorporating a dedicated temporal encoder between the image encoder and the LLM. Our temporal encoder leverages the Mamba State Space Model to integrate temporal information into image tokens, generating enriched representations that preserve inter-frame dynamics across the entire video sequence. This enriched encoding not only enhances video reasoning capabilities but also enables effective token reduction strategies, including test-time sampling and training-based temporal and spatial pooling, substantially reducing computational demands on the LLM without sacrificing key temporal information. By integrating these techniques, our approach simultaneously reduces training and inference latency while improving performance, enabling efficient and robust video understanding over extended temporal contexts. Extensive evaluations show that STORM achieves state-of-the-art results across various long video understanding benchmarks (more than 5% improvement on MLVU and LongVideoBench…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iccvw69036.2025.00614

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jiang, J., Li, X., Liu, Z., Li, M., Chen, G., Li, Z., Huang, D.-A., Liu, G., Yu, Z., Keutzer, K., Ahn, S., Kautz, J., Yin, H., Lu, Y., Han, S., & Byeon, W.
Affiliations
  • Nvidia (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • NVIDIA
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KR)
Venue
2025 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops (ICCVW)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2025-10-19
Pages
5889-5900
ISSN
2473-9936 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7131073923
Cited by
2
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2
FWCI
1.50
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Human Pose and Action Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
Keywords
long video understanding, video large language models, temporal modeling, Mamba, token reduction, video reasoning, computational efficiency, decoding latency, spatio-temporal representation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review