Cited by 281Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsHuman Pose and Action RecognitionVideo Analysis and Summarization

ActivityNet-QA: A Dataset for Understanding Complex Web Videos via Question Answering

Open access
Yu, Zhou, Xu, Dejing, Yu, Jun, Yu, Ting, Zhao, Zhou, Zhuang, Yueting, Tao, Dacheng·2019·Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

Recent developments in modeling language and vision have been successfully applied to image question answering. It is both crucial and natural to extend this research direction to the video domain for video question answering (VideoQA). Compared to the image domain where large scale and fully annotated benchmark datasets exists, VideoQA datasets are limited to small scale and are automatically generated, etc. These limitations restrict their applicability in practice. Here we introduce ActivityNet-QA, a fully annotated and large scale VideoQA dataset. The dataset consists of 58,000 QA pairs on 5,800 complex web videos derived from the popular ActivityNet dataset. We present a statistical analysis of our ActivityNet-QA dataset and conduct extensive experiments on it by comparing existing VideoQA baselines. Moreover, we explore various video representation strategies to improve VideoQA performance, especially for long videos.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33019127

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Sukhbaatar, S.; Weston, J.; Fergus, R.; et al. 2015. End-toend memory networks. In NIPS , 2440-2448.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yu, Z., Xu, D., Yu, J., Yu, T., Zhao, Z., Zhuang, Y., & Tao, D.
Affiliations
  • Zhejiang University (CN)
  • Hangzhou Dianzi University (CN)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
Venue
Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
Published
2019-07-17
Volume
33
Issue
01
Pages
9127-9134
ISSN
  • 2159-5399 (ISSN-L)
  • 2374-3468
OpenAlex
W2964220823
Cited by
281
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 44 · 2025: 73 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 5
FWCI
6.36
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • AAAI Publications (The Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI)) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61602405, Grant 61622205, 61622205, 61702143, 61836002)
  • China Knowledge Centre for Engineering Sciences and Technology
  • Australian Research Council (FL170100117, IH180100002, DP180103424)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Human Pose and Action Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Video Analysis and Summarization
Keywords
video question answering, annotated dataset, online video, ActivityNet, video representation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review