The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Coalitional Game Theory for Cooperative Micro-Grid Distribution Networks
Abstract
Micro-grid distribution networks that use distributed energy sources are expected to lie at the heart of the emerging smart grid technology. While existing approaches have focused on control and communication aspects in micro-grids, this paper use coalitional game theory to study novel cooperative strategies between the micro-grids of a distribution network. For this purpose, a coalitional game is formulated between a number of micro-grids (e.g., solar panels, wind turbines, PHEVs, etc.) that are, each, servicing a group of consumers (or an area) and that are connected to a macro-grid substation. For forming coalitions, an algorithm is proposed to allow the micro-grids to autonomously cooperate and self-organize into a partition composed of disjoint micro-grid coalitions. Each formed coalition consists of micro-grids that have a surplus of power to transfer or sell and of micro-grids that need to buy or acquire additional power to meet their demand. Within every coalition, the micro-grids coordinate the power transfer among themselves as well as with the macro-grid station, in a way to optimize a utility function that captures the total losses over the distribution power lines. Also, the proposed algorithm allows the micro-grids, in a distributed manner, to self-adapt to environmental changes such as variations in the power needs of the micro-grids. Simulation results show that the proposed algorithm yields a reduction in terms of the average power losses (over the distribution line) per micro-grid, reaching up to 31% improvement relative to the non-cooperative case.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Energy-Sharing Model With Price-Based Demand Response for Microgrids of Peer-to-Peer Prosumers
Liu, N., Yu, X., Wang, C., Li, C., Ma, L., & Lei, J. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Power Systems · doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2017.2649558 · Cited by 855
Solar–wind hybrid renewable energy system: A review
Khare, V., Nema, S., & Baredar, P. (2016) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.223 · Cited by 836
Microgrid clustering architectures
Bullich-Massagué, E., Díaz-González, F., Aragüés-Peñalba, M., Girbau-Llistuella, F., Olivella-Rosell, P., & Sumper, A. (2018) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.12.048 · Cited by 245
A cooperative game approach for coordinating multi-microgrid operation within distribution systems
Du, Y., Wang, Z., Liu, G., Chen, X., Yuan, H., Wei, Y., & Li, F. (2018) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.03.086 · Cited by 205
Eren, Y., Küçükdemiral, İ. B., & Üstoğlu, İ. (2017) · Optimization in Renewable Energy Systems · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-101041-9.00002-8 · Cited by 67
Metadata
- Authors
- Saad, W., Han, Z., & Poor, H. V.
- Venue
- 2011 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2011-06
- Pages
- 1-5
- ISSN
- 2164-7038 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2142398399
- Cited by
- 298
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.14
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Coalitional Game Theory for Cooperative Micro-Grid Distribution Networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/iccw.2011.5963577
- The paper
- Saad, W., Han, Z., & Poor, H. V. (2011). Coalitional Game Theory for Cooperative Micro-Grid Distribution Networks. 2011 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC). https://doi.org/10.1109/iccw.2011.5963577
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.