The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ZebraLancer: Private and Anonymous Crowdsourcing System atop Open Blockchain
Abstract
We design and implement the first private and anonymous decentralized crowdsourcing system ZebraLancer, and overcome two fundamental challenges of decentralizing crowdsourcing, i.e. data leakage and identity breach. First, our outsource-then-prove methodology resolves the tension between blockchain transparency and data confidentiality, which is critical in crowdsourcing use-case. ZebraLancer ensures: (i) a requester will not pay more than what data deserve, according to a policy announced when her task is published via the blockchain; (ii) each worker indeed gets a payment based on the policy, if he submits data to the blockchain; (iii) the above properties are realized not only without a central arbiter, but also without leaking the data to the open blockchain. Furthermore, the transparency of blockchain allows one to infer private information about workers and requesters through their participation history. On the other hand, allowing anonymity will enable a malicious worker to submit multiple times to reap rewards. ZebraLancer overcomes this problem by allowing anonymous requests/submissions without sacrificing the accountability. The idea behind is a subtle linkability: if a worker submits twice to a task, anyone can link the submissions, or else he stays anonymous and unlinkable across tasks. To realize this delicate linkability, we put forward a novel cryptographic concept, i.e. the common-prefix-linkable anonymous authentication. We remark the new anonymous authentication scheme might be of independent interest. Finally, we implement our protocol for a common image annotation task and deploy it in a test net of Ethereum. The experiment results show the applicability of our protocol with the existing real-world blockchain.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database
Deng, J., Dong, W., Socher, R., Li, L.-J., Li, K., & Fei-Fei, L. (2009) · 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2009.5206848 · Cited by 65,333
Blind Signatures for Untraceable Payments
Chaum, D. (1983) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-0602-4_18 · Cited by 3,329
Hawk: The Blockchain Model of Cryptography and Privacy-Preserving Smart Contracts
Kosba, A., Miller, A., Shi, E., Wen, Z., & Papamanthou, C. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP) · doi:10.1109/sp.2016.55 · Cited by 2,227
Formalizing and Securing Relationships on Public Networks
Szabo, N. (1997) · First Monday · doi:10.5210/fm.v2i9.548 · Cited by 2,158
Mobile crowdsensing: current state and future challenges
Ganti, R., Ye, F., & Lei, H. (2011) · IEEE Communications Magazine · doi:10.1109/mcom.2011.6069707 · Cited by 2,075
IPFS - Content Addressed, Versioned, P2P File SystemPreprint
Benet, J. (2014) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.4230/lipics.opodis.2022.9 · Cited by 1,856
The Bitcoin Backbone Protocol: Analysis and Applications
Garay, J. A., Kiayias, A., & Leonardos, N. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-46803-6_10 · Cited by 1,396
An Efficient System for Non-transferable Anonymous Credentials with Optional Anonymity Revocation
Camenisch, J., & Lysyanskaya, A. (2001) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-44987-6_7 · Cited by 1,321
Chaum, D., Fiat, A., & Naor, M. (1990) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/0-387-34799-2_25 · Cited by 1,138
Yang, D., Xue, G., Fang, X., & Tang, J. (2012) · ACM Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom) · doi:10.1145/2348543.2348567 · Cited by 1,003
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 46 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- hopwood, 0, Zcash Protocol Specification
- muncaster, 0, China's Internet wunderkind in the dock over alleged fraud
- wei, 0, Alipay apologizes for leak of personal info
- kelly, 0, Apple account hack raises concern about cloud storage
- mike isaac, 0, Uber hid 2016 breach paying hackers to delete stolen data
- kate, 0, Blockchain privacy Challenges solutions and unresolved issues
- 0, Ethereum Team Byzantium HF Announcement
- buterin, 2014, A next-generation smart contract and decentralized application platform
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–221 of 221
AcCrowd: Blockchain-based Crowdsourcing with Worker Anonymity and Payment Correctness
Jiang, Q., Xu, Z., Luo, X., Zhang, X., Xue, K., & Li, R. (2023) · Globecom · doi:10.1109/globecom54140.2023.10437088
Blockchain-based Privacy-preserving Crowdsourcing Scheme
Dong, C., Dong, X., Shen, J., & Cao, Z. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Computer and Communications (ICCC) · doi:10.1109/iccc59590.2023.10507529
FXChain: A Multi-consortium Permissioned Blockchain with Flexible Privacy-Preserving Strategies
Lou, Z., Ruan, N., & Cai, Y. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-981-97-5101-3_2
Towards a Regulation Compliant Crowdsourcing Mechanism in XG Through Multichain-Blockchain
Singh, M., Bjorndahl, W., Singh, A., & Camp, J. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Communications workshops · doi:10.1109/iccworkshops59551.2024.10615849
CrowdAL: Towards a Blockchain-empowered Active Learning System in Crowd Data Labeling
Hou, S., Wang, Y., & Zhao, Z. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on eScience · doi:10.1109/e-science62913.2024.10678683
Decentralized Anonymous Crowdsourcing with Blockchain and Anonymous Payments
Zhu, H., & Chau, C.-K. (2024) · IEEE Annual Congress on Artificial Intelligence of Things (AIoT) · doi:10.1109/aiot63253.2024.00053
Toward Blockchain-Based Crowdsourcing for Machine Learning Ground Truth
Alzahrani, A. A., Alahmadi, D. H., & Alharbi, N. M. (2024) · Studies in big data · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-70855-8_6
Blockchain-based secure crowdsourcing scheme to support solution reuse
Zhang, Y., Cui, W., & Miao, J. (2025) · International Conference on Network Communication and Information Security (ICNCIS) · doi:10.1117/12.3052003
Blind Signature Based Anonymous Authentication on Trust for Decentralized Mobile Crowdsourcing
Feng, W., Wei, D., & Wang, Q. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications (TrustCom) · doi:10.1109/trustcom63139.2024.00035
Yaqoubi, Z., Ghahfarokhi, B. S., Seifhashemi, F., & Mahdavi, M. (2025) · The Journal of Supercomputing · doi:10.1007/s11227-025-07300-z
Lightweight Cross-Chain Privacy-Preserving Protocol
Jiang, P., & Zhu, L. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-96-4395-0_8
Amiri, M. J., Agrawal, D., & Abbadi, A. E. (2025) · Synthesis lectures on data management · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-91058-6_1
Sun, Q., Xue, K., Li, M., & Luo, X. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing · doi:10.1109/tdsc.2025.3587900
HPCBL: A Privacy-Preserving Data Computing Model for the Supercomputing Internet
Shao, W., Wang, L., Jia, C., Wang, J., Xu, S., Zhang, S., Li, M., & Wang, Q. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing · doi:10.1109/tcc.2025.3604606
A Distributed Privacy Protection Method for Crowd Sensing Based on Trust Evaluation
Liu, H., Maoze, T., Peng, Y., & Peng, H. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-3543-9_12
Anonymous Task Assignment and Worker Payment in Mobile Crowdsensing
Nicewarner, T., Allami, A. A., & Lin, D. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing · doi:10.1109/tetc.2026.3662784
Protecting workers in crowdsourcing platforms : a technical perspective
Duguépéroux, J. (2020) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/3d4ca379za7c3z40e9zb7c1zf7f24f9c5db5
BPQA: A Blockchain-Based Privacy-Preserving and Quality-Aware Incentive for Mobile Crowdsensing
Tong, F., Kong, C., Zhou, Y., Xing, F., Cheng, G., & He, S. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing · doi:10.1109/tmc.2026.3683655
Ethereum Blockchain Security, Performance, Markets, and Applications: Scoping Review with ☸SAIMSARA
SAIMSARA (2026) · SAIMSARA Journal · doi:10.62487/saimsarad7a61035
$\mathsf {DARTIC}$: Decentralized Anonymous Reputation at Scale for Trustworthy Crowdsourcing
Bouchiha, M. A., Rabah, M., Champagnat, R., Korba, A. A., & Ghamri-Doudane, Y. M. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Services Computing · doi:10.1109/tsc.2026.3710404
Li, J., Yang, Y., Yang, J., & Chen, Z. (2026) · International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (CSCWD) · doi:10.1109/cscwd68734.2026.11582029
Metadata
- Authors
- Lu, Y., Tang, Q., & Wang, G.
- Affiliations
- New Jersey Institute of Technology (US)
- Venue
- 2018 IEEE 38th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2018-07
- Pages
- 853-865
- OpenAlex
- W2790257806
- Cited by
- 224
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 6
- FWCI
- 21.58
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Cryptography and Data Security
- Keywords
- blockchain, data privacy, data leakage, linkability, unlinkability, anonymous authentication, Ethereum, image annotation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review