The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
LOCI: fast outlier detection using the local correlation integral
Abstract
Outlier detection is an integral part of data mining and has attracted much attention recently [M. Breunig et al., (2000)], [W. Jin et al., (2001)], [E. Knorr et al., (2000)]. We propose a new method for evaluating outlierness, which we call the local correlation integral (LOCI). As with the best previous methods, LOCI is highly effective for detecting outliers and groups of outliers (a.k.a. micro-clusters). In addition, it offers the following advantages and novelties: (a) It provides an automatic, data-dictated cutoff to determine whether a point is an outlier-in contrast, previous methods force users to pick cut-offs, without any hints as to what cut-off value is best for a given dataset. (b) It can provide a LOCI plot for each point; this plot summarizes a wealth of information about the data in the vicinity of the point, determining clusters, micro-clusters, their diameters and their inter-cluster distances. None of the existing outlier-detection methods can match this feature, because they output only a single number for each point: its outlierness score, (c) Our LOCI method can be computed as quickly as the best previous methods, (d) Moreover, LOCI leads to a practically linear approximate method, aLOCI (for approximate LOCI), which provides fast highly-accurate outlier detection. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work to use approximate computations to speed up outlier detection. Experiments on synthetic and real world data sets show that LOCI and aLOCI can automatically detect outliers and micro-clusters, without user-required cut-offs, and that they quickly spot both expected and unexpected outliers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LOF: identifying density-based local outliers
Breunig, M. M., Kriegel, H.-P., Ng, R. T., & Sander, J. (2000) · ACM SIGMOD Record · doi:10.1145/335191.335388 · Cited by 5,207
Hawkins, D. M. (1980) · doi:10.1007/978-94-015-3994-4 · Cited by 2,982
Distance-based outliers: algorithms and applications
Knorr, E. M., Ng, R. T., & Tucakov, V. (2000) · The VLDB Journal The International Journal on Very Large Data Bases · doi:10.1007/s007780050006 · Cited by 1,195
Cited by
Chandola, V., Banerjee, A., & Kumar, V. (2009) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/1541880.1541882 · Cited by 11,687
Pimentel, M. A. F., Clifton, D. A., Clifton, L., & Tarassenko, L. (2014) · Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.sigpro.2013.12.026 · Cited by 1,649
Graph based anomaly detection and description: a survey
Akoglu, L., Tong, H., & Koutra, D. (2015) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1007/s10618-014-0365-y · Cited by 1,504
A Comparative Evaluation of Unsupervised Anomaly Detection Algorithms for Multivariate Data
Goldstein, M., & Uchida, S. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0152173 · Cited by 1,032
Hierarchical Density Estimates for Data Clustering, Visualization, and Outlier Detection
Campello, R. J. G. B., Moulavi, D., Zimek, A., & Sander, J. (2015) · ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data · doi:10.1145/2733381 · Cited by 915
Metadata
- Authors
- Papadimitriou, S., Kitagawa, H., Gibbons, P. B., & Faloutsos, C.
- Venue
- Proceedings 19th International Conference on Data Engineering (Cat. No.03CH37405)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2004-05-13
- Pages
- 315-326
- ISSN
- 1084-4627 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2110784166
- Cited by
- 846
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 16.91
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: LOCI: fast outlier detection using the local correlation integral. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/icde.2003.1260802
- The paper
- Papadimitriou, S., Kitagawa, H., Gibbons, P. B., & Faloutsos, C. (2004). LOCI: fast outlier detection using the local correlation integral. Proceedings 19th International Conference on Data Engineering (Cat. No.03CH37405). https://doi.org/10.1109/icde.2003.1260802
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.