Cited by 108

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

NSCaching: Simple and Efficient Negative Sampling for Knowledge Graph Embedding

Zhang, Yongqi, Yao, Quanming, Shao, Yingxia, Chen, Lei·2019·2019 IEEE 35th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icde.2019.00061

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. yao, 2018, Taking human out of learning applications A survey on automated machine learning
  2. yang, 2017, Embedding entities and relations for learning and inference in knowledge bases
  3. wang, 2018, Incorporating GAN for negative sampling in knowledge representation learning, AAAI, 10.1609/aaai.v32i1.11536 · DOI
  4. trouillon, 2017, Knowledge graph completion via complex tensor factorization, JMLR, 18, 4735
  5. 10.1145/1242572.1242667 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1007/BF00992696 · DOI
  7. wang, 2018, On evaluating embedding models for knowledge base completion
  8. 10.1109/TKDE.2017.2754499 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1145/3219819.3220041 · DOI
  10. zhang, 2018, NSCaching Simple and efficient negative sampling for knowledge graph embedding
  11. glorot, 2010, Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks, AISTATS, 249
  12. goodfellow, 2014, Generative adversarial nets, NeurIPS, 2672
  13. 10.3115/v1/P15-1067 · DOI
  14. 10.1145/1273496.1273551 · DOI
  15. kumar, 2010, Self-paced learning for latent variable models, NeurIPS, 1189
  16. paszke, 2017, On Automatic Differentiation
  17. 10.1145/1376616.1376746 · DOI · Paper page
  18. nickel, 2011, A three-way model for collective learning on multi-relational data, ICML, 11, 809
  19. 10.1007/s10994-013-5363-6 · DOI · Paper page
  20. singhal, 2012, Introducing the knowledge graph: things, not strings, The Official Google Blog, 5
  21. 10.3115/v1/D14-1067 · DOI
  22. 10.18653/v1/N18-1133 · DOI · Paper page
  23. bordes, 2013, Translating embeddings for modeling multi-relational data, NeurIPS, 2787
  24. 10.1007/978-3-540-76298-0_52 · DOI · Paper page
  25. fan, 2014, Transition-based knowledge graph embedding with relational mapping properties, PACLIC
  26. arjovsky, 2017, Wasserstein GAN
  27. lao, 2011, Random walk inference and learning in a large scale knowledge base, EMNLP, 529
  28. liu, 2017, Analogical inference for multi-relational embeddings, ICML, 2168
  29. lin, 2015, Learning entity and relation embeddings for knowledge graph completion, AAAI, 15, 2181
  30. mikolov, 2013, Linguistic regularities in continuous space word representations, ACL, 746
  31. nickel, 2016, Holographic embeddings of knowledge graphs, AAAI, 2, 3
  32. 10.1109/JPROC.2015.2483592 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, Y., Yao, Q., Shao, Y., & Chen, L.
Venue
2019 IEEE 35th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2019-04
Pages
614-625
Cited by
108
References
9

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review