The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Distance measures for effective clustering of ARIMA time-series
Abstract
Much environmental and socioeconomic time-series data can be adequately modeled using autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) models. We call such time series "ARIMA time series". We propose the use of the linear predictive coding (LPC) cepstrum for clustering ARIMA time series, by using the Euclidean distance between the LPC cepstra of two time series as their dissimilarity measure. We demonstrate that LPC cepstral coefficients have the desired features for accurate clustering and efficient indexing of ARIMA time series. For example, just a few LPC cepstral coefficients are sufficient in order to discriminate between time series that are modeled by different ARIMA models. In fact, this approach requires fewer coefficients than traditional approaches, such as DFT (discrete Fourier transform) and DWT (discrete wavelet transform). The proposed distance measure can be used for measuring the similarity between different ARIMA models as well. We cluster ARIMA time series using the "partition around medoids" method with various similarity measures. We present experimental results demonstrating that, using the proposed measure, we achieve significantly better clusterings of ARIMA time series data as compared to clusterings obtained by using other traditional similarity measures, such as DFT, DWT, PCA (principal component analysis), etc. Experiments were performed both on simulated and real data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Time-series clustering – A decade review
Aghabozorgi, S., Seyed Shirkhorshidi, A., & Ying Wah, T. (2015) · Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.is.2015.04.007 · Cited by 1,826
Experiencing SAX: A novel symbolic representation of time series
Lin, J., Keogh, E., Wei, L., & Lonardi, S. (2007) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1007/s10618-007-0064-z · Cited by 1,618
Big IoT data analytics: Architecture, opportunities, and open research challenges
(2017) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2017.2689040 · Cited by 980
Evaluating the Accuracy of Continuous Glucose-Monitoring Sensors
Kovatchev, B. P., Gonder-Frederick, L. A., Cox, D. J., & Clarke, W. L. (2004) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.27.8.1922 · Cited by 312
ACT: Adversarial Convolutional Transformer for Time Series Forecasting
Li, Y., Wang, H., Li, J., Liu, C., & Tan, J. (2022) · 2022 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn55064.2022.9892791 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Kalpakis, K., Gada, D., & Puttagunta, V.
- Venue
- Proceedings 2001 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining
- Publisher
- IEEE Comput. Soc
- Published
- 2002-11-14
- Pages
- 273-280
- ISSN
- 1550-4786 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2100718094
- Cited by
- 442
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.69
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Distance measures for effective clustering of ARIMA time-series. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/icdm.2001.989529
- The paper
- Kalpakis, K., Gada, D., & Puttagunta, V. (2002). Distance measures for effective clustering of ARIMA time-series. Proceedings 2001 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining. https://doi.org/10.1109/icdm.2001.989529
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.