The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
CMAR: accurate and efficient classification based on multiple class-association rules
Abstract
Previous studies propose that associative classification has high classification accuracy and strong flexibility at handling unstructured data. However, it still suffers from the huge set of mined rules and sometimes biased classification or overfitting since the classification is based on only a single high-confidence rule. The authors propose a new associative classification method, CMAR, i.e., Classification based on Multiple Association Rules. The method extends an efficient frequent pattern mining method, FP-growth, constructs a class distribution-associated FP-tree, and mines large databases efficiently. Moreover, it applies a CR-tree structure to store and retrieve mined association rules efficiently, and prunes rules effectively based on confidence, correlation and database coverage. The classification is performed based on a weighted /spl chi//sup 2/ analysis using multiple strong association rules. Our extensive experiments on 26 databases from the UCI machine learning database repository show that CMAR is consistent, highly effective at classification of various kinds of databases and has better average classification accuracy in comparison with CBA and C4.5. Moreover, our performance study shows that the method is highly efficient and scalable in comparison with other reported associative classification methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mining frequent patterns without candidate generation
Han, J., Pei, J., & Yin, Y. (2000) · ACM SIGMOD Record · doi:10.1145/335191.335372 · Cited by 6,402
Self-citation
Cited by
Data mining: concepts and techniques
(2012) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.49-3305 · Cited by 28,531
Frequent pattern mining: current status and future directions
Han, J., Cheng, H., Xin, D., & Yan, X. (2007) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1007/s10618-006-0059-1 · Cited by 1,380
Self-citationInterpretable machine learning: Fundamental principles and 10 grand challenges
Rudin, C., Chen, C., Chen, Z., Huang, H., Semenova, L., & Zhong, C. (2022) · Statistics Surveys · doi:10.1214/21-ss133 · Cited by 958
CPAR: Classification based on Predictive Association Rules
Yin, X., & Han, J. (2003) · Proceedings of the 2003 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining · doi:10.1137/1.9781611972733.40 · Cited by 833
Self-citationLetham, B., Rudin, C., McCormick, T. H., & Madigan, D. (2015) · The Annals of Applied Statistics · doi:10.1214/15-aoas848 · Cited by 766
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, W., Han, J., & Pei, J.
- Venue
- Proceedings 2001 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining
- Publisher
- IEEE Comput. Soc
- Published
- 2002-11-14
- Pages
- 369-376
- ISSN
- 1550-4786 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2167681385
- Cited by
- 1,204
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 25.77
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CMAR: accurate and efficient classification based on multiple class-association rules. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/icdm.2001.989541
- The paper
- Li, W., Han, J., & Pei, J. (2002). CMAR: accurate and efficient classification based on multiple class-association rules. Proceedings 2001 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining. https://doi.org/10.1109/icdm.2001.989541
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.