Cited by 833Data Mining Algorithms and ApplicationsData Mining and Machine Learning ApplicationsText and Document Classification Technologies

CPAR: Classification based on Predictive Association Rules

Yin, Xiaoxin, Han, Jiawei·2003·Proceedings of the 2003 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining

Abstract

Recent studies in data mining have proposed a new classification approach, called associative classification, which, according to several reports, such as [7, 6], achieves higher classification accuracy than traditional classification approaches such as C4.5. However, the approach also suffers from two major deficiencies: (1) it generates a very large number of association rules, which leads to high processing overhead; and (2) its confidence-based rule evaluation measure may lead to overfitting. In comparison with associative classification, traditional rule-based classifiers, such as C4.5, FOIL and RIPPER, are substantially faster but their accuracy, in most cases, may not be as high. In this paper, we propose a new classification approach, CPAR (Classification based on Predictive Association Rules), which combines the advantages of both associative classification and traditional rule-based classification. Instead of generating a large number of candidate rules as in associative classification, CPAR adopts a greedy algorithm to generate rules directly from training data. Moreover, CPAR generates and tests more rules than traditional rule-based classifiers to avoid missing important rules. To avoid overfitting, CPAR uses expected accuracy to evaluate each rule and uses the best k rules in prediction.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1137/1.9781611972733.40

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CPAR combines the positive aspects of both associative classification and traditional rule-based classification, does not generate a large set of candidates as in associative classification, and applies a greedy approach for generating rules c_g directly from training data.

    “In [109] the authors propose the approach f named CPAR (Classification based on Predictive Association Rules) combining the positive aspects of both associative classification and traditional rule-based classification. Indeed, following the basic idea of FOIL [80], CPAR does not generate a large set of candidates as in associative classification, and applies a greedy approach for generating rules”

    From A Survey of Methods for Explaining Black Box Models (2019) · cites this paper as [109]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yin, X., & Han, J.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 2003 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining
Published
2003-05
Pages
331-335
OpenAlex
W1623342295
Cited by
833
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 51 · 2014: 53 · 2013: 47 · 2012: 71
FWCI
19.68
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
SIAM International Conference on Data Mining (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Data Mining Algorithms and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Data Mining and Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Text and Document Classification Technologies
Keywords
associative classification, rule-based classification, overfitting, expected accuracy, rule evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review