The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Feature selection for clustering - a filter solution
Abstract
Processing applications with a large number of dimensions has been a challenge for the KDD community. Feature selection, an effective dimensionality reduction technique, is an essential pre-processing method to remove noisy features. In the literature only a few methods have been proposed for feature selection for clustering, and almost all these methods are 'wrapper' techniques that require a clustering algorithm to evaluate candidate feature subsets. The wrapper approach is largely unsuitable in real-world applications due to its heavy reliance on clustering algorithms that require parameters such as the number of clusters, and the lack of suitable clustering criteria to evaluate clustering in different subspaces. In this paper we propose a 'filter' method that is independent of any clustering algorithm. The proposed method is based on the observation that data with clusters has a very different point-to-point distance histogram to that of data without clusters. By exploiting this we propose an entropy measure that is low if data has distinct clusters and high if it does not. The entropy measure is suitable for selecting the most important subset of features because it is invariant with the number of dimensions, and is affected only by the quality of clustering. Extensive performance evaluation over synthetic, benchmark, and real datasets shows its effectiveness.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
When Is ''Nearest Neighbor'' Meaningful?
Beyer, K., Goldstein, J., Ramakrishnan, R., & Shaft, U. (1999) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-49257-7_15 · Cited by 2,403
Cited by
Toward integrating feature selection algorithms for classification and clustering
Liu, H., & Yu, L. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2005.66 · Cited by 2,706
Self-citationJoint Embedding Learning and Sparse Regression: A Framework for Unsupervised Feature Selection
Hou, C., Nie, F., Li, X., Yi, D., & Wu, Y. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tcyb.2013.2272642 · Cited by 554
Feature Selection for Clustering: A Review
Alelyani, S., Tang, J., & Liu, H. (2018) · Data Clustering · doi:10.1201/9781315373515-2 · Cited by 371
Self-citationUsing support vector machine with a hybrid feature selection method to the stock trend prediction
Lee, M.-C. (2009) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2009.02.038 · Cited by 302
Massively parallel feature selection: an approach based on variance preservation
Zhao, Z., Zhang, R., Cox, J., Duling, D., & Sarle, W. (2013) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/s10994-013-5373-4 · Cited by 85
Metadata
- Authors
- Dash, M., Choi, K., Scheuermann, P., & Liu, H.
- Venue
- 2002 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, 2002. Proceedings.
- Publisher
- IEEE Comput. Soc
- Published
- 2003-06-26
- Pages
- 115-122
- ISSN
- 1550-4786 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2153922613
- Cited by
- 383
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.10
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Feature selection for clustering - a filter solution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/icdm.2002.1183893
- The paper
- Dash, M., Choi, K., Scheuermann, P., & Liu, H. (2003). Feature selection for clustering - a filter solution. 2002 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, 2002. Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1109/icdm.2002.1183893
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.