The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Toward integrating feature selection algorithms for classification and clustering
Abstract
This paper introduces concepts and algorithms of feature selection, surveys existing feature selection algorithms for classification and clustering, groups and compares different algorithms with a categorizing framework based on search strategies, evaluation criteria, and data mining tasks, reveals unattempted combinations, and provides guidelines in selecting feature selection algorithms. With the categorizing framework, we continue our efforts toward-building an integrated system for intelligent feature selection. A unifying platform is proposed as an intermediate step. An illustrative example is presented to show how existing feature selection algorithms can be integrated into a meta algorithm that can take advantage of individual algorithms. An added advantage of doing so is to help a user employ a suitable algorithm without knowing details of each algorithm. Some real-world applications are included to demonstrate the use of feature selection in data mining. We conclude this work by identifying trends and challenges of feature selection research and development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Elements of Statistical Learning
Hastie, T., Friedman, J., & Tibshirani, R. (2001) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-21606-5 · Cited by 24,162
Text classification from labeled and unlabeled documents using EM
Nigam, K., Mccallum, A. K., Thrun, S., & Mitchell, T. (2000) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1007692713085 · Cited by 2,736
Cited by
Neighborhood rough set based heterogeneous feature subset selection
Hu, Q., Yu, D., Liu, J., & Wu, C. (2008) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2008.05.024 · Cited by 1,085
A review of feature selection methods on synthetic data
Bolón-Canedo, V., Sánchez-Maroño, N., & Alonso-Betanzos, A. (2013) · Knowledge and Information Systems · doi:10.1007/s10115-012-0487-8 · Cited by 830
Feature selection using Joint Mutual Information Maximisation
Bennasar, M., Hicks, Y., & Setchi, R. (2015) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2015.07.007 · Cited by 659
MIFS-ND: A mutual information-based feature selection method
Hoque, N., Bhattacharyya, D. K., & Kalita, J. K. (2014) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2014.04.019 · Cited by 442
An up-to-date comparison of state-of-the-art classification algorithms
Zhang, C., Liu, C., Zhang, X., & Almpanidis, G. (2017) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2017.04.003 · Cited by 440
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, H., & Yu, L.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering
- Published
- 2005-04
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 491-502
- ISSN
- 1041-4347 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2102831150
- Cited by
- 2,706
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 82.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Toward integrating feature selection algorithms for classification and clustering. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tkde.2005.66
- The paper
- Liu, H., & Yu, L. (2005). Toward integrating feature selection algorithms for classification and clustering. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/tkde.2005.66
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.