The DOI matches its Crossref record.
On the privacy preserving properties of random data perturbation techniques
Abstract
Privacy is becoming an increasingly important issue in many data mining applications. This has triggered the development of many privacy-preserving data mining techniques. A large fraction of them use randomized data distortion techniques to mask the data for preserving the privacy of sensitive data. This methodology attempts to hide the sensitive data by randomly modifying the data values often using additive noise. We question the utility of the random value distortion technique in privacy preservation. We note that random objects (particularly random matrices) have "predictable" structures in the spectral domain and it develops a random matrix-based spectral filtering technique to retrieve original data from the dataset distorted by adding random values. We present the theoretical foundation of this filtering method and extensive experimental results to demonstrate that in many cases random data distortion preserve very little data privacy. We also point out possible avenues for the development of new privacy-preserving data mining techniques like exploiting multiplicative and colored noise for preserving privacy in data mining applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
L -diversity: Privacy beyond k -anonymity
Machanavajjhala, A., Kifer, D., Gehrke, J., & Venkitasubramaniam, M. (2007) · ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data · doi:10.1145/1217299.1217302 · Cited by 3,617
L-diversity: privacy beyond k-anonymity
Machanavajjhala, A., Gehrke, J., Kifer, D., & Venkitasubramaniam, M. (2006) · 22nd International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE'06) · doi:10.1109/icde.2006.1 · Cited by 2,362
Privacy-preserving data publishing: A survey of recent developments
Fung, B. C. M., Wang, K., Chen, R., & Yu, P. S. (2010) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/1749603.1749605 · Cited by 1,704
A General Survey of Privacy-Preserving Data Mining Models and Algorithms
Aggarwal, C. C., & Yu, P. S. (2008) · Advances in Database Systems · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-70992-5_2 · Cited by 469
Big Data in Public Health: Terminology, Machine Learning, and Privacy
Mooney, S. J., & Pejaver, V. (2018) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040617-014208 · Cited by 325
Metadata
- Authors
- Kargupta, H., Datta, S., Wang, Q., & Sivakumar, K.
- Venue
- Third IEEE International Conference on Data Mining
- Publisher
- IEEE Comput. Soc
- Published
- 2004-04-23
- Pages
- 99-106
- ISSN
- 1550-4786 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2164341199
- Cited by
- 618
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.55
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the privacy preserving properties of random data perturbation techniques. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/icdm.2003.1250908
- The paper
- Kargupta, H., Datta, S., Wang, Q., & Sivakumar, K. (2004). On the privacy preserving properties of random data perturbation techniques. Third IEEE International Conference on Data Mining. https://doi.org/10.1109/icdm.2003.1250908
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.