The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Collaborative Filtering for Implicit Feedback Datasets
Abstract
A common task of recommender systems is to improve customer experience through personalized recommendations based on prior implicit feedback. These systems passively track different sorts of user behavior, such as purchase history, watching habits and browsing activity, in order to model user preferences. Unlike the much more extensively researched explicit feedback, we do not have any direct input from the users regarding their preferences. In particular, we lack substantial evidence on which products consumer dislike. In this work we identify unique properties of implicit feedback datasets. We propose treating the data as indication of positive and negative preference associated with vastly varying confidence levels. This leads to a factor model which is especially tailored for implicit feedback recommenders. We also suggest a scalable optimization procedure, which scales linearly with the data size. The algorithm is used successfully within a recommender system for television shows. It compares favorably with well tuned implementations of other known methods. In addition, we offer a novel way to give explanations to recommendations given by this factor model.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Restricted Boltzmann machines for collaborative filtering
Salakhutdinov, R., Mnih, A., & Hinton, G. (2007) · Proceedings of the 24th international conference on Machine learning · doi:10.1145/1273496.1273596 · Cited by 1,885
Explaining collaborative filtering recommendations
Herlocker, J. L., Konstan, J. A., & Riedl, J. (2000) · Proceedings of the 2000 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work · doi:10.1145/358916.358995 · Cited by 1,731
Cited by
Collaborative Deep Learning for Recommender Systems
Wang, H., Wang, N., & Yeung, D.-Y. (2015) · Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/2783258.2783273 · Cited by 1,657
Bias and Debias in Recommender System: A Survey and Future Directions
Chen, J., Dong, H., Wang, X., Feng, F., Wang, M., & He, X. (2023) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/3564284 · Cited by 741
Advances in Collaborative Filtering
Koren, Y., Rendle, S., & Bell, R. (2022) · Recommender Systems Handbook · doi:10.1007/978-1-0716-2197-4_3 · Cited by 324
Self-citationA Survey on Bayesian Deep Learning
Wang, H., & Yeung, D.-Y. (2021) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3409383 · Cited by 247
Understanding Negative Sampling in Graph Representation Learning
Yang, Z., Ding, M., Zhou, C., Yang, H., Zhou, J., & Tang, J. (2020) · Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3394486.3403218 · Cited by 159
Metadata
- Authors
- Hu, Y., Koren, Y., & Volinsky, C.
- Venue
- 2008 Eighth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2008-12
- Pages
- 263-272
- ISSN
- 1550-4786 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2101409192
- Cited by
- 3,170
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 21.51
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Collaborative Filtering for Implicit Feedback Datasets. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/icdm.2008.22
- The paper
- Hu, Y., Koren, Y., & Volinsky, C. (2008). Collaborative Filtering for Implicit Feedback Datasets. 2008 Eighth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining. https://doi.org/10.1109/icdm.2008.22
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.