Cited by 43Anomaly Detection Techniques and ApplicationsMachine Learning and Data ClassificationFace and Expression Recognition

Unsupervised Feature Selection for Outlier Detection by Modelling Hierarchical Value-Feature Couplings

Open access
Pang, Guansong, Cao, Longbing, Chen, Ling, Liu, Huan·2016·2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM)

Abstract

Proper feature selection for unsupervised outlier detection can improve detection performance but is very challenging due to complex feature interactions, the mixture of relevant features with noisy/redundant features in imbalanced data, and the unavailability of class labels. Little work has been done on this challenge. This paper proposes a novel Coupled Unsupervised Feature Selection framework (CUFS for short) to filter out noisy or redundant features for subsequent outlier detection in categorical data. CUFS quantifies the outlierness (or relevance) of features by learning and integrating both the feature value couplings and feature couplings. Such value-to-feature couplings capture intrinsic data characteristics and distinguish relevant features from those noisy/redundant features. CUFS is further instantiated into a parameter-free Dense Subgraph-based Feature Selection method, called DSFS. We prove that DSFS retains a 2-approximation feature subset to the optimal subset. Extensive evaluation results on 15 real-world data sets show that DSFS obtains an average 48% feature reduction rate, and enables three different types of pattern-based outlier detection methods to achieve substantially better AUC improvements and/or perform orders of magnitude faster than on the original feature set. Compared to its feature selection contender, on average, all three DSFS-based detectors achieve more than 20% AUC improvement.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icdm.2016.0052

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [8][8] S. Wu and S. Wang, 'Information-theoretic outlier detection for largescale categorical data,' IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering , vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 589-602, 2013. -
  2. [12][12] X. Chen and M. Wasikowski, 'FAST: A ROC-based feature selection metric for small samples and imbalanced data classification problems,' in SIGKDD , 2008, pp. 124-132. -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pang, G., Cao, L., Chen, L., & Liu, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Technology Sydney (AU)
  • Arizona State University (US)
Venue
2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2016-12
Volume
2016
Pages
410-419
ISSN
1550-4786 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2583608529
Cited by
43
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 4
FWCI
3.23
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • Singapore Management University Institutional Knowledge (InK) (Singapore Management University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
  • IEEE Conference Proceedings
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face and Expression Recognition
Keywords
unsupervised feature selection, outlier detection, categorical data, feature redundancy, noisy features, dense subgraphs, approximation guarantees, class imbalance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review