Cited by 7Time Series Analysis and ForecastingContext-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsMusic and Audio Processing

EXTRACT: Strong Examples from Weakly-Labeled Sensor Data

Open access
Blalock, Davis W., Guttag, John V.·2016·2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM)

Abstract

Thanks to the rise of wearable and connected devices, sensor-generated time series comprise a large and growing fraction of the world's data. Unfortunately, extracting value from this data can be challenging, since sensors report low-level signals (e.g., acceleration), not the high-level events that are typically of interest (e.g., gestures). We introduce a technique to bridge this gap by automatically extracting examples of real-world events in low-level data, given only a rough estimate of when these events have taken place. By identifying sets of features that repeat in the same temporal arrangement, we isolate examples of such diverse events as human actions, power consumption patterns, and spoken words with up to 96% precision and recall. Our method is fast enough to run in real time and assumes only minimal knowledge of which variables are relevant or the lengths of events. Our evaluation uses numerous publicly available datasets and over 1 million samples of manually labeled sensor data.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icdm.2016.0093

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 25 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. T. Oliphant, "Numba python bytecode to LLVM translator," in Proceed- ings of the Python for Scientific Computing Conference (SciPy), 2012.
  2. B. McFee, C. Raffel, D. Liang, D. P. Ellis, M. McVicar, E. Battenberg, and O. Nieto, "librosa: Audio and Music Signal Analysis in Python," in Proceedings of the 14th Python in Science Conference, 2015.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blalock, D. W., & Guttag, J. V.
Affiliations
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2016-12
Pages
799-804
ISSN
1550-4786 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2526992896
Cited by
7
References
25
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.59
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Time Series Analysis and Forecasting
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Music and Audio Processing
Keywords
event extraction, wearable sensors, time series, gesture recognition, human action recognition, electricity consumption patterns, spoken word recognition, real-time processing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review