Cited by 362Time Series Analysis and ForecastingTraffic Prediction and Management TechniquesForecasting Techniques and Applications

Deep and Confident Prediction for Time Series at Uber

Open access
Zhu, Lingxue, Laptev, Nikolay·2017·2017 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW)

Abstract

Reliable uncertainty estimation for time series prediction is critical in many fields, including physics, biology, and manufacturing. At Uber, probabilistic time series forecasting is used for robust prediction of number of trips during special events, driver incentive allocation, as well as real-time anomaly detection across millions of metrics. Classical time series models are often used in conjunction with a probabilistic formulation for uncertainty estimation. However, such models are hard to tune, scale, and add exogenous variables to. Motivated by the recent resurgence of Long Short Term Memory networks, we propose a novel end-to-end Bayesian deep model that provides time series prediction along with uncertainty estimation. We provide detailed experiments of the proposed solution on completed trips data, and successfully apply it to large-scale time series anomaly detection at Uber.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icdmw.2017.19

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Burez et al. utilized a method called the CUBE method to improve the churn prediction performance.

    “Burez, Jonathan, and Dirk Van den Poel.(2009) utilized a method called the CUBE method to improve the churn prediction performance.[95].”

    From A Survey on Churn Analysis in Various Business Domains (2020) · cites this paper as [95]

    The paper’s introduction (p. 1) and evaluation (pp. 5–7) concern time-series forecasting and anomaly detection at Uber. Searches for Burez, Van den Poel, CUBE, and churn prediction found no passage addressing the attributed claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. [1][1] J. D. Horne and W. Manzenreiter, 'Accounting for mega-events,' International Review for the Sociology of Sport , vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 187-203, 2004. -
  2. [2][2] R. J. Hyndman and Y. Khandakar, 'Automatic time series forecasting: the forecast package for R,' Journal of Statistical Software , vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 1-22, 2008. -
  3. [3][3] S. Hochreiter and J. Schmidhuber, 'Long short-term memory,' Neural computation , vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 1735-1780, 1997. -
  4. [4][4] M. Assaad, R. Bon´ e, and H. Cardot, 'A new boosting algorithm for improved time-series forecasting with recurrent neural networks,' Information Fusion , vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 41-55, 2008. -
  5. [5][5] O. P. Ogunmolu, X. Gu, S. B. Jiang, and N. R. Gans, 'Nonlinear systems identification using deep dynamic neural networks,' arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.01439 , 2016. - · arXiv
  6. [6][6] N. Laptev, J. Yosinski, E. Li, and S. Smyl, 'Time-series extreme event forecasting with neural networks at uber,' International Conference on Machine Learning , 2017. -
  7. [7][7] A. Kendall and Y. Gal, 'What uncertainties do we need in bayesian deep learning for computer vision?' arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.04977 , 2017. - · arXiv
  8. [9][9] W. W.-S. Wei, Time series analysis . Addison-Wesley publ Reading, 1994. -
  9. [10][10] T. Opitz, 'Modeling asymptotically independent spatial extremes based on laplace random fields,' Spatial Statistics , vol. 16, pp. 118, 2016. -
  10. [11][11] R. D. Dietz, T. L. Casavant, T. E. Scheetz, T. A. Braun, and M. S. Andersland, 'Modeling the impact of run-time uncertainty on optimal computation scheduling using feedback,' in Parallel Processing '97 , Aug, pp. 481-488. -
  11. [12][12] Y. Gal, J. Hron, and A. Kendall, 'Concrete dropout,' arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.07832 , 2017. - · arXiv
  12. [14][14] J. Paisley, D. Blei, and M. Jordan, 'Variational bayesian inference with stochastic search,' in Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Machine Learning , 2012, pp. 1367-1374. -
  13. [15][15] D. P. Kingma and M. Welling, 'Auto-encoding variational bayes,' The International Conference on Learning Representations , 2014. -
  14. [16][16] J. M. Hern´ andez-Lobato and R. Adams, 'Probabilistic backpropagation for scalable learning of bayesian neural networks,' in Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Machine Learning , 2015, pp. 1861-1869. -
  15. [18][18] M. Fortunato, C. Blundell, and O. Vinyals, 'Bayesian recurrent neural networks,' arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.02798 , 2017. - · arXiv
  16. [19][19] J. M. Hern´ andez-Lobato, Y. Li, M. Rowland, D. Hern´ andez-Lobato, T. Bui, and R. E. Turner, 'Black-box α -divergence minimization,' in Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Machine Learning , 2016, pp. 1511-1520. -
  17. [20][20] Y. Li and Y. Gal, 'Dropout inference in bayesian neural networks with alpha-divergences,' arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.02914 , 2017. - · arXiv
  18. [21][21] Y. Gal, 'Uncertainty in deep learning,' Ph.D. dissertation, PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, 2016. -
  19. [22][22] Y. Gal and Z. Ghahramani, 'A theoretically grounded application of dropout in recurrent neural networks,' in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 2016, pp. 1019-1027. -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhu, L., & Laptev, N.
Venue
2017 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2017-11
Pages
103-110
ISSN
2375-9259 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2751802138
Cited by
362
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 81 · 2020: 65 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 1
FWCI
22.14
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE ... International Conference on Data Mining workshops (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Time Series Analysis and Forecasting
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Forecasting Techniques and Applications
Keywords
uncertainty estimation, Bayesian deep learning, LSTM, time series anomaly detection, exogenous variables

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review