Cited by 9Online Learning and AnalyticsMultimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsEducational Technology and Pedagogy

“Exercise difficulty prediction in online education systems,”

Fang, Jiansheng, Zhao, Wei, Jia, Dongya·2019·2019 International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW)

Abstract

In Online Education System (OES), it is popular to assess examinee by providing exercises with different difficulty. So Exercise Difficulty Prediction (EDP) is a fundamental task of OES, such as medicine examination and school assignment. In view of the rich semantic information embedded in exercise which contains texts and images, it is hard to represent exercise and predict its difficulty. In this paper, we propose a novel Bayesian inference-based Exercise Difficulty Prediction (BEDP) framework to predict difficulty of visual-textual exercise. In BEDP, given exercises with texts, images and difficulty label, we first apply a pretrained Deep Multimodal Embedding model to obtain the unified multimodal representations of each exercise. Then we propose a Bayesian inference-based Softmax Regression classifier to predict the difficulty of exercise. Variational Inference (VI) is applied for approximately solve probabilistic model with a joint distribution of observations and latent variables. By experimenting on two self-collected dataset, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed framework on predicting the difficulty of exercise, and conduct convergence diagnostics for Bayesian inference.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icdmw.2019.00053

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • With automatic testing systems and large quantities of historical test logs, deep learning has been increasingly used for feature extraction and/or difficulty estimation in QDP.

    “With automatic testing systems and ready availability of large quantities of historical test logs, deep learning has been increasingly used for feature extraction (word embeddings, question representations, etc.) and/or difficulty estimation (Fang et al., 2019; Lin et al., 2019; Xue et al., 2020).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 49 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fang, J., Zhao, W., & Jia, D.
Venue
2019 International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2019-11
Pages
311-317
ISSN
2375-9259 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3000343461
Cited by
9
References
49
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.29
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE ... International Conference on Data Mining workshops (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Educational Technology and Pedagogy
Keywords
online education system, Bayesian inference, variational inference, multimodal representation, softmax regression, latent variables, convergence diagnostics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review