Cited by 11Transportation and Mobility InnovationsElectric Vehicles and InfrastructureTransportation Planning and Optimization

Individual mobility by shared autonomous electric vehicle fleets: Cost and CO2 comparison with internal combustion engine vehicles in Berlin, Germany

Fournier, G., Pfeiffer, C., Baumann, M., Worner, R.·2017·2017 International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC)

Abstract

The current mobility paradigm is based on cheap fossil fuel energy, high CO2emissions and individual mobility. This paradigm faces economic, ecological and social limits. The aim of this paper is to analyse if a shared autonomous Electric Vehicles (EVs) fleet can meet these challenges and at the same time satisfy the current requirements of privately owned Internal Combustion Engine Vehicles (ICEVs). Therefore, analytical models have been developed to compute the fleet size and to simulate and investigate impacts on mobility behaviour in Berlin, Germany. The collected data were used to calculate cost effects, the energy consumption and the carbon footprint of different shared autonomous EVs in comparison with privately owned ICEVs. The approach shows that the system of a shared autonomous EV fleet could lower journey time, reduce CO2emissions, free up parking space in urban areas and generate cost benefits for customers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/ice.2017.8279909

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The system of electric AVs can reduce journey time, free up parking in urban areas, and generate cost benefits for customers.

    “The system of electric AVs can reduce journey time, free up parking in urban areas, and generate cost benefits for customers [43][44][45].”
  • The introduction of AVs is considered a chance to increase the allure of public transportation by enabling broad dissemination of shared vehicles that might support the mass rapid transit network.

    “By enabling a broad dissemination of shared vehicles that might support the mass rapid transit network, the introduction of AVs is considered as a chance to increase the allure of public transportation.”
  • Improving public transportation can persuade more people to use sustainable means of transportation instead of private vehicles, lowering traffic congestion and emissions.

    “By improving public transportation, this attempts to persuade more people to utilize sustainable means of transportation instead of private vehicles, so lowering traffic congestion and emissions [43,44,67,68,72].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fournier, G., Pfeiffer, C., Baumann, M., & Worner, R.
Affiliations
  • Pforzheim University of Applied Sciences (DE)
  • Universidade Nova de Lisboa (PT)
Venue
2017 International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2017-06
Pages
368-376
OpenAlex
W2787684077
Cited by
11
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.61
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Transportation and Mobility Innovations
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation Planning and Optimization
Keywords
shared autonomous electric vehicles, fleet size, internal combustion engine vehicles, CO2 emissions, carbon footprint, energy consumption, mobility behavior, parking reduction, travel time, cost comparison, Berlin

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review