The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Blockchain-Based Supply Chain Quality Management Framework
Abstract
Recent quality scandals reveal the importance of quality management from a supply chain perspective. Although there has been many related studies focusing on supply chain quality management, the technologies used still have difficulties in resolving problems arising from the lack of trust in supply chains. The root reason lies in three challenges brought to the traditional centralized trust mechanism: self-interests of supply chain members, information asymmetry in production processes, costs and limitations of quality inspections. Blockchain is a promising technology to address these problems. In this paper, we discuss how to improve the supply chain quality management by adopting the blockchain technology, and propose a framework for blockchain-based supply chain quality management.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Market for "Lemons": Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism
Akerlof, G. A. (1970) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/1879431 · Cited by 23,016
Cited by
Analysis of Blockchain technology: pros, cons and SWOT
Niranjanamurthy, M., Nithya, B. N., & Jagannatha, S. (2019) · Cluster Computing · doi:10.1007/s10586-018-2387-5 · Cited by 478
Blockchain for smart communities: applications, challenges and opportunities
Aggarwal, S., Chaudhary, R., Aujla, G. S., Kumar, N., Choo, K.-K. R., & Zomaya, A. Y. (2019) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2019.06.018 · Cited by 344
Security, Performance, and Applications of Smart Contracts: A Systematic Survey
Rouhani, S., & Deters, R. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2911031 · Cited by 309
Security Challenges and Opportunities for Smart Contracts in Internet of Things: A Survey
Peng, K., Li, M., Huang, H., Wang, C., Wan, S., & Choo, K.-K. R. (2021) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2021.3074544 · Cited by 130
The role of Internet of Things in food supply chain quality management: A review
Ben-Daya, M., Hassini, E., Bahroun, Z., & Banimfreg, B. H. (2021) · Quality Management Journal · doi:10.1080/10686967.2020.1838978 · Cited by 120
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, S., Shi, R., Ren, Z., Yan, J., Shi, Y., & Zhang, J.
- Venue
- 2017 IEEE 14th International Conference on e-Business Engineering (ICEBE)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2017-11
- Pages
- 172-176
- OpenAlex
- W2770675950
- Cited by
- 310
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 19.27
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Blockchain-Based Supply Chain Quality Management Framework. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/icebe.2017.34
- The paper
- Chen, S., Shi, R., Ren, Z., Yan, J., Shi, Y., & Zhang, J. (2017). A Blockchain-Based Supply Chain Quality Management Framework. 2017 IEEE 14th International Conference on e-Business Engineering (ICEBE). https://doi.org/10.1109/icebe.2017.34
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.