Cited by 31Low-power high-performance VLSI designAdvanced Memory and Neural ComputingAdvanced Neural Network Applications

Approximate Computing Methods for Embedded Machine Learning

Ibrahim, Ali, Osta, Mario, Alameh, Mohamad, Saleh, Moustafa, Chible, Hussein, Valle, Maurizio·2018·2018 25th IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Circuits and Systems (ICECS)

Abstract

Embedding Machine Learning enables integrating intelligence in recent application domains such as Internet of Things, portable healthcare systems, and wearable devices. This paper presents an assessment of approximate computing methods at algorithmic, architecture, and circuit levels and draws perspectives for further developments and applications. The main goal is to investigate how approximate computing may reduce the complexity and enable the feasibility of embedded Machine Learning (ML) systems. Though ML is a powerful paradigm for applications in the perceptual domain (i.e. vision, touch, hearing, etc.), their computational complexity is very high and consequently real time operation and ultra-low power are still very challenging objectives. On the other hand, approximate computing has emerged as an effective solution to reduce hardware complexity, time latency and to increase energy efficiency.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icecs.2018.8617877

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Existing messaging systems are built for the Cloud, where machines communicate over low latency wired networks, and do not provide mechanisms to guarantee latency when operating in wireless channels with large latency variations.

    “However, the existing messaging systems are built for the Cloud, where machines communicate over low latency wired networks (Gigabit Ethernet, Infiniband), and as such do not provide mechanisms to guarantee latency when operating in wireless channels with large latency variations.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ibrahim, A., Osta, M., Alameh, M., Saleh, M., Chible, H., & Valle, M.
Affiliations
University of Genoa (IT)
Venue
2018 25th IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Circuits and Systems (ICECS)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2018-12
Pages
845-848
OpenAlex
W2914948529
Cited by
31
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5
FWCI
6.78
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Circuits and Systems (ICECS) (publishedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutial Research Information System (University of Genoa) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Low-power high-performance VLSI design
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
approximate computing, embedded machine learning, hardware complexity reduction, energy efficiency, low-power electronics, Internet of Things, wearable devices, real-time operation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review