Recent Temporal Pattern Mining for Septic Shock Early Prediction
Abstract
Sepsis is a leading cause of in-hospital death over the world and septic shock, the most severe complication of sepsis, reaches a mortality rate as high as 50%. Early diagnosis and treatment can prevent most morbidity and mortality. In this work, Recent Temporal Patterns (RTPs) are used in conjunction with SVM classifier to build a robust yet interpretable model for early diagnosis of septic shock. This model is applied to two different prediction tasks: visit-level early diagnosis and event-level early prediction. For each setting, this model is compared against several strong baselines including atemporal method called Last-Value, six classic machine learning algorithms, and lastly, a state-of-the-art deep learning model: Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM). Our results suggest that RTP-based model can outperform all aforementioned baseline models for both diagnosis tasks. More importantly, the extracted interpretative RTPs can shed lights for the clinicians to discover progression behavior and latent patterns among septic shock patients.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Machine learning models to diagnose sepsis ahead of time are typically left or right aligned.
“Machine learning models to diagnose sepsis ahead of time are typically left or right aligned (Fig. 1) [14].”
From Machine learning for the prediction of sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy (2020) · cites this paper as [14]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 50 · Cited by 46
- Authors
- Khoshnevisan, F., Ivy, J., Capan, M., Arnold, R., Huddleston, J., & Chi, M.
- Affiliations
- North Carolina State University (US)
- Drexel University (US)
- Venue
- 2018 IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics (ICHI)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2018-06
- Pages
- 229-240
- OpenAlex
- W2883762974
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 4
- FWCI
- 61.22
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics (ICHI) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Keywords
- septic shock, sepsis, early diagnosis, temporal pattern mining, model interpretability, support vector machine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review