Cited by 20Sepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentMachine Learning in HealthcareArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Predictive Models of Sepsis in Adult ICU Patients

Wang, Roman Z., Sun, Catherine H., Schroeder, Philip H., Ameko, Mawulolo K., Moore, Christopher C., Barnes, Laura E.·2018·2018 IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics (ICHI)

Abstract

Sepsis is a dysregulated systemic response to infection that causes organ dysfunction. It is the leading cause of in-hospital mortality and is responsible for the longest, most expensive, hospital stays in the United States. Prognostic modeling of sepsis has demonstrated potential for improving treatment and outcomes for critical care patients. However, the majority of previous models have relied on an outdated definition of sepsis based on systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). Therefore, this study sought to build predictive models of sepsis using the most recent definition of sepsis, Sepsis-3. A total of three classification methods, including logistic regression (LR), support vector machines (SVM), and logistic model trees (LMT), were used to predict onset of sepsis in adult Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients using vital signs and blood culture results. For patients who did not develop sepsis, predictor values were selected from a random 48-hour time window during the patient's ICU stay. For those who developed sepsis, a random time was selected for the patient within 48 to 6 hours prior to onset of sepsis, and the predictor values with the closest preceding time were extracted. The LMT produced superior classification performance compared with the LR and SVM. The wide time window used for data extraction improves the clinical utility of the models relative to those built in previous work. However, while the models showed similar sensitivity and specificity to pr…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/ichi.2018.00068

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 12 · Cited by 20

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. 10.1016/S0011-3840(97)80011-1 · DOI
  2. 10.1097/00003246-200107000-00002 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1186/s13613-016-0204-y · DOI
  4. alberti, 2003, Influence of systemic inflammatory response syndrome and sepsis on outcome of critically ill infected patients Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 168, 77
  5. 10.1038/sdata.2016.35 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1097/00003246-199804000-00032 · DOI
  7. 10.1007/s00134-005-0039-8 · DOI
  8. 10.1056/NEJMoa1415236 · DOI
  9. 10.1164/rccm.201504-0781OC · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.2196/medinform.5909 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1001/jama.2016.0287 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Wang, R. Z., Sun, C. H., Schroeder, P. H., Ameko, M. K., Moore, C. C., & Barnes, L. E.
Venue
2018 IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics (ICHI)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2018-06
Pages
390-391
OpenAlex
W2883607909
Cited by
20
References
12
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3
FWCI
31.94
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics (ICHI) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
sepsis prediction, Sepsis-3, intensive care unit patients, adult critical care, vital signs, logistic model tree, support vector machine, logistic regression, false positive rate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review