Cited by 30Industrial Vision Systems and Defect DetectionNon-Destructive Testing TechniquesImage Retrieval and Classification Techniques

Feature extraction algorithm based on adaptive wavelet packet for surface defect classification

Lee, C.S., Choi, C.-H., Choi, J.Y., Kim, Y.K., Choi, S.H.·2002·Proceedings of 3rd IEEE International Conference on Image Processing

Abstract

This paper proposes a feature extraction method to effectively handle the textural characteristics in images with defects in cold rolled strips. An adaptive wavelet packet scheme is developed to produce the optimum number of features automatically through subband coding gain. Also four classical entropy features in the images with defects are used as local features in the spatial domain. A neural network is used to classify the defects from these features. Experiments with real image data show good training and generalization performances of the proposed method.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icip.1996.560968

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Lee et al. [72] used wavelet-based methods to classify 8 types of defects in cold strip.

    “Lee et al. [72] (cold strip application) and [70] (hot strip application) used wavelet-based methods to classify 8 types and 24 types of defects, respectively.”

    From Review of vision-based steel surface inspection systems (2014) · cites this paper as [72]

  • Lee et al. [72] used an adaptive wavelet (AWP) packet scheme to produce the optimum number of features through subband coding gain.

    “Lee et al. [72] used an adaptive wavelet (AWP) packet scheme to produce the optimum number of features through the subband coding gain.”

    From Review of vision-based steel surface inspection systems (2014) · cites this paper as [72]

  • Three-layer NN-BP of ten hidden nodes and eight output nodes was used with standard back propagation algorithm for classification with very high accuracy of 99%.

    “Three-layer NN-BP of ten hidden nodes and eight output nodes (eight types of defects) was use with standard back propagation algorithm for classification with very high accuracy of 99%.”

    From Review of vision-based steel surface inspection systems (2014) · cites this paper as [72]

  • Steel surfaces exhibit many types of defects, and NN-BP has been extensively used to classify such defects.

    “Steel surfaces exhibit many types of defects, and NNBP has been extensively used to classify such defects [31,36,54,59,63,72,78,80].”

    From Review of vision-based steel surface inspection systems (2014) · cites this paper as [72]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, C. S., Choi, C.-H., Choi, J. Y., Kim, Y. K., & Choi, S. H.
Affiliations
Seoul National University (KR)
Venue
Proceedings of 3rd IEEE International Conference on Image Processing
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2002-12-23
Volume
1
Pages
673-676
ISSN
1522-4880 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2165321742
Cited by
30
References
8
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.08
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Proceedings - International Conference on Image Processing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
Keywords
surface defect classification, cold-rolled steel strip, feature extraction, entropy features, texture features, neural network classification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review