Cited by 1Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsGenerative Adversarial Networks and Image SynthesisSpeech and dialogue systems

Character-Centered Dialogue Generation from Scene-Level Prompts

Open access
Kang, Taewon, Lin, Ming C.·2026·2026 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP)

Abstract

Recent advances in scene-based video generation enable coherent visual narratives from structured prompts, yet a key aspect of storytelling -- character-driven dialogue and speech -- remains underexplored. We present a modular pipeline that transforms action-level prompts into visually and auditorily grounded dialogue, enriching scene-based storytelling with natural voice and character expression. Our method takes a pair of prompts per scene, defining the setting and character behavior. While a story generation model such as Text2Story produces the visual scene, we focus on generating expressive, character-consistent utterances grounded in both the prompts and a representative scene image. A pretrained vision-language encoder extracts high-level visual semantics, which are combined with structured prompts to guide a large language model for dialogue synthesis. To maintain contextual and emotional consistency across scenes, we introduce a Recursive Narrative Bank, a speaker-aware, temporally structured memory that accumulates each character's dialogue history. Inspired by Script Theory, this design enables dialogue that reflects evolving goals, social context, and narrative roles. Finally, we render each utterance as expressive, character-conditioned speech, producing fully voiced, multimodal video narratives. Our training-free framework generalizes across diverse story settings, providing a scalable solution for coherent, character-grounded audiovisual storytelling.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icip61757.2026.11630308

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When integrated into real game production pipelines, LLM-based approaches face persistent challenges: freeform outputs often violate structural constraints, produce inconsistent world knowledge or personas, and fail to satisfy engine-level parsing and execution requirements.

    “However, when integrated into real game production pipelines, LLM-based approaches face persistent challenges; freeform outputs often violate structural constraints, produce inconsistent world knowledge or personas, and fail to satisfy engine-level parsing and execution requirements.”

    From Game Knowledge Management System: Schema-Governed LLM Pipeline for Executable Narrative Generation in RPGs (2026) · cites this paper as [7]

    The Detailed Ablation Study (p. 11) reports that removing the Recursive Narrative Bank reduces dialogue continuity, supporting the concern about character consistency. The paper studies scene-based audiovisual storytelling, not real game production pipelines; our copy does not support the claims about freeform output violating structural constraints, inconsistent world knowledge, or engine-level parsing and execution failures. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Most LLM-for-game systems lack reproducible mechanisms for engine-level validation and deployment and are primarily evaluated through text-level analysis or subjective judgment rather than verified runtime execution.

    “Consequently, most LLM-for-game systems lack reproducible mechanisms for engine-level validation and deployment and are primarily evaluated through text-level analysis or subjective judgment rather than verified runtime execution [5-7].”

    From Game Knowledge Management System: Schema-Governed LLM Pipeline for Executable Narrative Generation in RPGs (2026) · cites this paper as [7]

    The Quantitative Evaluation (p. 4) and Users Evaluation (p. 5) describe automated metrics and participant judgments for this paper’s multimodal storytelling system. They do not address LLM-for-game systems as a group or whether those systems lack reproducible engine-level validation, deployment, and verified runtime execution. Searches for game-engine validation and runtime evaluation found no passage establishing the attributed claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. [1][1] Taewon Kang, Divya Kothandaraman, and Ming C Lin, 'Text2story: Advancing video storytelling with text guidance,' arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.06310 , 2025. - · arXiv
  2. [2][2] Roger C Schank and Robert P Abelson, Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures , Psychology press, 2013. -
  3. [3][3] Gordon H Bower, John B Black, and Terrence J Turner, 'Scripts in memory for text,' Cognitive psychology , vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 177-220, 1979. -
  4. [5][5] Xiaochuan Lin and Xiangyong Chen, 'Improving visual storytelling with multimodal large language models,' arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.02586 , 2024. - · arXiv
  5. [6][6] Shuai Yang, Yuying Ge, Yang Li, Yukang Chen, Yixiao Ge, Ying Shan, and Yingcong Chen, 'Seed-story: Multimodal long story generation with large language model,' arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.08683 , 2024. - · arXiv
  6. [7][7] Chuanqi Zang, Jiji Tang, Rongsheng Zhang, Zeng Zhao, Tangjie Lv, Mingtao Pei, and Wei Liang, 'Let storytelling tell vivid stories: An expressive and fluent multimodal storyteller,' arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.07301 , 2024. - · arXiv
  7. [8][8] Samee Arif, Taimoor Arif, Muhammad Saad Haroon, Aamina Jamal Khan, Agha Ali Raza, and Awais Athar, 'The art of storytelling: Multi-agent generative ai for dynamic multimodal narratives,' arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.11261 , 2024. - · arXiv
  8. [9][9] Jaeyeon Bae, Seokhoon Jeong, Seokun Kang, Namgi Han, Jae-Yon Lee, Hyounghun Kim, and Taehwan Kim, 'Sound of story: Multi-modal storytelling with audio,' arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.19264 , 2023. - · arXiv
  9. [10][10] Samuel S Sohn, Danrui Li, Sen Zhang, Che-Jui Chang, and Mubbasir Kapadia, 'From words to worlds: Transforming one-line prompt into immersive multi-modal digital stories with communicative llm agent,' arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.10478 , 2024. - · arXiv
  10. [11][11] Min Zhang, Zilin Wang, Liyan Chen, Kunhong Liu, and Juncong Lin, 'Dialogue director: Bridging the gap in dialogue visualization for multimodal storytelling,' arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.20725 , 2024. - · arXiv
  11. [12][12] Xuenan Xu, Jiahao Mei, Chenliang Li, Yuning Wu, Ming Yan, Shaopeng Lai, Ji Zhang, and Mengyue Wu, 'Mm-storyagent: Immersive narrated storybook video generation with a multi-agent paradigm across text, image and audio,' arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.05242 , 2025. - · arXiv
  12. [13][13] Linrui Tian, Qi Wang, Bang Zhang, and Liefeng Bo, 'Emo: Emote portrait alive generating expressive portrait videos with audio2video diffusion model under weak conditions,' in European Conference on Computer Vision . Springer, 2024, pp. 244-260. -
  13. [14][14] Jiahao Cui, Hui Li, Yun Zhan, Hanlin Shang, Kaihui Cheng, Yuqi Ma, Shan Mu, Hang Zhou, Jingdong Wang, and Siyu Zhu, 'Hallo3: Highly dynamic and realistic portrait image animation with video diffusion transformer,' in Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference , 2025, pp. 21086-21095. -
  14. [15][15] Gaojie Lin, Jianwen Jiang, Jiaqi Yang, Zerong Zheng, Chao Liang, Yuan Zhang, and Jingtuo Liu, 'Omnihuman-1: Rethinking the scaling-up of one-stage conditioned human animation models,' in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , 2025, pp. 13847-13858. -
  15. [18][18] Zhuoyi Yang, Jiayan Teng, Wendi Zheng, Ming Ding, Shiyu Huang, Jiazheng Xu, Yuanming Yang, Wenyi Hong, Xiaohan Zhang, Guanyu Feng, et al., 'Cogvideox: Text-to-video diffusion models with an expert transformer,' arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.06072 , 2024. - · arXiv
  16. [19][19] Junnan Li, Dongxu Li, Caiming Xiong, and Steven Hoi, 'Blip: Bootstrapping language-image pre-training for unified vision-language understanding and generation,' in International conference on machine learning . PMLR, 2022, pp. 12888-12900. -
  17. [20][20] Yuxuan Wang, RJ Skerry-Ryan, Daisy Stanton, Yonghui Wu, Ron J Weiss, Navdeep Jaitly, Zongheng Yang, Ying Xiao, Zhifeng Chen, Samy Bengio, et al., 'Tacotron: Towards end-to-end speech synthesis,' arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.10135 , 2017. - · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kang, T., & Lin, M. C.
Affiliations
University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Venue
2026 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2026-09
Pages
1-6
ISSN
1522-4880 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W6979264393
Cited by
0
References
0
FWCI
0.00
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings - International Conference on Image Processing (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
University of Maryland
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
Keywords
dialogue generation, audiovisual narrative, speech synthesis, character expression, large language models, script theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review