Cited by 33Cryptographic Implementations and SecurityComputer Science and EngineeringChaos-based Image/Signal Encryption

A comprehensive performance empirical study of the symmetric algorithms:AES, 3DES, Blowfish and Twofish

Dibas, Hasan, Sabri, Khair Eddin·2021·2021 International Conference on Information Technology (ICIT)

Abstract

Developing software applications that provide services in all business fields such as finance, health, education, real estate and social media etc., must maintain various quality attributes, such as security, performance, availability, reliability, scalability, maintainability, usability and so on. If we talk about security for example, then we must take care of couple of properties like confidentiality, integrity, availability, non-repudiation and accountability. To achieve these targets there are different ways, one of them is using cryptographic mechanism. Cryptography has two basic types of algorithms, symmetric and asymmetric. Each of them provides encryption and decryption processes. In this paper, we conducted a performance evaluation between four of the symmetric algorithms AES, 3DES, Blowfish and Twofish. We evaluated the execution time, memory utilization and ciphertext size on the encryption and decryption processes. We performed the comparison against different files size by building a .NET application using C#. By analyzing the result, we noticed that AES has the lowest execution time in encryption and decryption processes, while Twofish has the highest execution time. In the encryption process, AES and 3DES consumes less memory than the blowfish and Twofish and they used very close amount of memory. While AES utilized less memory in the decryption. Finally, Blowfish and Twofish have the biggest ciphertext size.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icit52682.2021.9491644

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • 3DES is a symmetric block cipher that operates on 64-bit blocks of plaintext and applies the DES algorithm three consecutive times.

    “Triple DES, commonly referred to as 3DES, was introduced as an enhancement to the original DES algorithm 46. It is a symmetric block cipher that operates on 64-bit blocks of plaintext. To strengthen the security of standard DES, the encryption process in 3DES involves applying the DES algorithm three consecutive times”

Authors
Dibas, H., & Sabri, K. E.
Affiliations
University of Jordan (JO)
Venue
2021 International Conference on Information Technology (ICIT)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2021-07-14
Pages
344-349
OpenAlex
W3184693917
Cited by
33
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 5
FWCI
2.54
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptographic Implementations and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Computer Science and Engineering
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption
Keywords
symmetric encryption algorithms, AES, 3DES, Blowfish, Twofish, encryption performance, decryption performance, execution time, memory usage, ciphertext size, file encryption

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review