Emotion Recognition from Physiological Signals using Multi-Hypergraph Neural Networks
Abstract
Emotion recognition from physiological signals is an effective way to discern the inner state of users. Existing works are lack in the exploration of latent correlation among multiple physiological signals and relationship among different subjects. To tackle this issue, we propose to recognize emotion from physiological signals using multi-hypergraph neural networks (MHGNN). In this method, the correlation among different subjects is formulated in the multi-hypergraph structure, where each type of physiological signal is used to generate one hypergraph. In each hypergraph, the hyperedges are used to represent the connections among the vertices (subject, stimuli). Thus, the emotion recognition task is modeled as classifying each vertex in the multi-hypergraph. Experimental results and comparisons with the state-of-the-art methods in the DEAP dataset demonstrate the superior performance of our method. The comparative experiments based on available biological knowledge verify that MHGNN can depict the real biological response process in a much more precise way.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Brain regions related to the frontal lobe have high recognition accuracy.
“Taking into account that the brain regions related to the frontal lobe have high recognition accuracy [28]”
From Multimodal Emotion Recognition Using a Hierarchical Fusion Convolutional Neural Network (2021) · cites this paper as [28]
Cites
A review of affective computing: From unimodal analysis to multimodal fusion
Poria, S., Cambria, E., Bajpai, R., & Hussain, A. (2017) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2017.02.003 · Cited by 1,644 · see citing works
Prediction of asynchronous dimensional emotion ratings from audiovisual and physiological data
Ringeval, F., Eyben, F., Kroupi, E., Yuce, A., Thiran, J.-P., Ebrahimi, T., Lalanne, D., & Schuller, B. (2015) · Pattern Recognition Letters · doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2014.11.007 · Cited by 202 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Missing data will also lead to parameter estimation bias and hypothesis testing errors of inference, which will negatively influence the learning methods for emotion recognition [10].”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Multimodal Emotion Recognition Using a Hierarchical Fusion Convolutional Neural Network
Zhang, Y., Cheng, C., & Zhang, Y. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3049516 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Muhammad, F., Hussain, M., & Aboalsamh, H. (2023) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics13050977 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
- Authors
- Zhu, J., Zhao, X., Hu, H., & Gao, Y.
- Affiliations
- Tsinghua University (CN)
- Venue
- 2019 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2019-07
- Pages
- 610-615
- OpenAlex
- W2964715068
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 1.89
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME) (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Key Research and Development Program of China
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face and Expression Recognition
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
- Keywords
- emotion recognition, physiological signals, inter-subject correlation, DEAP dataset, multimodal physiological data
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review