Cited by 202Emotion and Mood RecognitionSentiment Analysis and Opinion MiningSpeech and Audio Processing

Prediction of asynchronous dimensional emotion ratings from audiovisual and physiological data

Open access
Ringeval, Fabien, Eyben, Florian, Kroupi, Eleni, Yuce, Anil, Thiran, Jean-Philippe, Ebrahimi, Touradj, Lalanne, Denis, Schuller, Björn·2015·Pattern Recognition Letters

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.patrec.2014.11.007

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Deep learning is used for learning joint feature representations for multimodal sensor data in human affect recognition.

    “Learning joint feature representations for multimodal data. In multimodal approaches, DNNs are leveraged to learn joint feature representations from multiple unimodal feature representations to accomplish feature-level fusion [65].”
  • Ringeval et al. [65] found that while the given physiological signal has lower predictive power than audiovisual signals, both are complementary.

    “They found that while the given physiological signal has lower predictive power than audiovisual signals, both are complementary.”
  • One study suggested that a smaller window size (2s) could be the best choice.

    “One study suggested that a smaller window size (2s) could be the best choice [65].”
  • Depending on the nature of the source audio, it can be beneficial to apply HSFs to frame-level LLDs according to a sliding window before applying the RNN.

    “Depending on the nature of the source audio, it can be beneficial to apply HSFs to frame-level LLDs according to a sliding window before applying the RNN [151], [65].”
  • Ringeval et al. concluded that in feature-level fusion, ECG data helps for prediction of valence, but not arousal.

    “They concluded that in featurelevel fusion, ECG data helps for prediction of valence, but not arousal.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 63 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ringeval, F., Eyben, F., Kroupi, E., Yuce, A., Thiran, J.-P., Ebrahimi, T., Lalanne, D., & Schuller, B.
Affiliations
  • University of Fribourg (CH)
  • Technical University of Munich (DE)
  • École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
  • University of Passau (DE)
Corresponding author
Ringeval, Fabien
Venue
Pattern Recognition Letters
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-11
Volume
66
Pages
22-30
ISSN
0167-8655 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2005418748
Cited by
202
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 9
FWCI
26.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pattern Recognition Letters (publishedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • OPUS (Augsburg University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
  • Seventh Framework Programme
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
Keywords
automatic emotion recognition, arousal, valence, long short-term memory, recurrent neural networks, multimodal fusion, feature-level fusion, decision fusion, audiovisual information, physiological signals, ECG, electrodermal activity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review