Cited by 16Machine Learning and AlgorithmsMachine Learning and Data ClassificationNeural Networks and Applications

Bias-variance tradeoff in hybrid generative-discriminative models

Bouchard, Guillaume·2007·Sixth International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA 2007)

Abstract

Given any generative classifier based on an inexact density model, we can define a discriminative counterpart that reduces its asymptotic error rate, while increasing the estimation variance. An optimal bias-variance balance might be found using hybrid generative-discriminative (HGD) approaches. In these paper, these methods are defined in a unified framework. This allow us to find sufficient conditions under which an improvement in generalization performances is guaranteed. Numerical experiments illustrate the well fondness of our statements.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icmla.2007.85

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bouchard, G.
Corresponding author
Bouchard, Guillaume
Venue
Sixth International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA 2007)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2007-12
Pages
124-129
OpenAlex
W3147467675
Cited by
16
References
12
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.65
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Algorithms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
Keywords
bias-variance trade-off, hybrid generative-discriminative models, generative classifiers, discriminative classifiers, asymptotic error rate, estimation variance, generalization performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review