The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Toward an Online Anomaly Intrusion Detection System Based on Deep Learning
Abstract
In the past twenty years, progress in intrusion detection has been steady but slow. The biggest challenge is to detect new attacks in real time. In this work, a deep learning approach for anomaly detection using a Restricted Boltzmann Machine (RBM) and a deep belief network are implemented. Our method uses a one-hidden layer RBM to perform unsupervised feature reduction. The resultant weights from this RBM are passed to another RBM producing a deep belief network. The pre-trained weights are passed into a fine tuning layer consisting of a Logistic Regression (LR) classifier with multi-class soft-max. We have implemented the deep learning architecture in C++ in Microsoft Visual Studio 2013 and we use the DARPA KDDCUP'99 dataset to evaluate its performance. Our architecture outperforms previous deep learning methods implemented by Li and Salama in both detection speed and accuracy. We achieve a detection rate of 97.9% on the total 10% KDDCUP'99 test dataset. By improving the training process of the simulation, we are also able to produce a low false negative rate of 2.47%. Although the deficiencies in the KDDCUP'99 dataset are well understood, it still presents machine learning approaches for predicting attacks with a reasonable challenge. Our future work will include applying our machine learning strategy to larger and more challenging datasets, which include larger classes of attacks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets
Hinton, G. E., Osindero, S., & Teh, Y.-W. (2006) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.2006.18.7.1527 · Cited by 16,336
Greedy layer-wise training of deep networks
Bengio, Y., Lamblin, P., Popovici, D., & Larochelle, H. (2007) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 19 · doi:10.7551/mitpress/7503.003.0024 · Cited by 4,841
Can Deep Learning Revolutionize Mobile Sensing?
Lane, N. D., & Georgiev, P. (2015) · Proceedings of the 16th International Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications · doi:10.1145/2699343.2699349 · Cited by 282
Cited by
Deep Learning for Anomaly Detection: A Survey
Chalapathy, R., & Chawla, S. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1901.03407 · Cited by 1,240
Machine Learning and Deep Learning Methods for Cybersecurity
Xin, Y., Kong, L., Liu, Z., Chen, Y., Li, Y., Zhu, H., Gao, M., Hou, H., & Wang, C. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2836950 · Cited by 1,228
Machine Learning and Deep Learning Methods for Intrusion Detection Systems: A Survey
Liu, H., & Lang, B. (2019) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app9204396 · Cited by 1,133
Cybersecurity data science: an overview from machine learning perspective
Sarker, I. H., Kayes, A. S. M., Badsha, S., Alqahtani, H., Watters, P., & Ng, A. (2020) · Journal of Big Data · doi:10.1186/s40537-020-00318-5 · Cited by 766
Machine Learning for Anomaly Detection: A Systematic Review
Nassif, A. B., Talib, M. A., Nasir, Q., & Dakalbab, F. M. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3083060 · Cited by 748
Metadata
- Authors
- Alrawashdeh, K., & Purdy, C.
- Venue
- 2016 15th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2016-12
- Pages
- 195-200
- OpenAlex
- W2584408238
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 16.04
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Toward an Online Anomaly Intrusion Detection System Based on Deep Learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/icmla.2016.0040
- The paper
- Alrawashdeh, K., & Purdy, C. (2016). Toward an Online Anomaly Intrusion Detection System Based on Deep Learning. 2016 15th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA). https://doi.org/10.1109/icmla.2016.0040
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.