Cited by 282Context-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsHuman Mobility and Location-Based AnalysisMobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing

Can Deep Learning Revolutionize Mobile Sensing?

Open access
Lane, Nicholas D., Georgiev, Petko·2015·Proceedings of the 16th International Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications

Abstract

Sensor-equipped smartphones and wearables are transforming a variety of mobile apps ranging from health monitoring to digital assistants. However, reliably inferring user behavior and context from noisy and complex sensor data collected under mobile device constraints remains an open problem, and a key bottleneck to sensor app development. In recent years, advances in the field of deep learning have resulted in nearly unprecedented gains in related inference tasks such as speech and object recognition. However, although mobile sensing shares many of the same data modeling challenges, we have yet to see deep learning be systematically studied within the sensing domain. If deep learning could lead to significantly more robust and efficient mobile sensor inference it would revolutionize the field by rapidly expanding the number of sensor apps ready for mainstream usage.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2699343.2699349

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This work supports the need for more research into optimal strategies for partitioning DNN inference across mobile and edge systems to improve latency, reduce power consumption, and increase the complexity of the DNNs serviceable to wearable platforms.

    “also supports the need for more research into optimal strategies for partitioning DNN inference across mobile and edge systems to improve latency, reduce power consumption, and increase the complexity of the DNNs serviceable to wearable platforms.”
  • Lane et al. performed a small-scale exploration into the performance of DNNs for HAR applications on mobile platforms in various configurations, including utilizing the phone's CPU and DSP and offloading computation onto remote devices.

    “Lane et al. performed a small-scale exploration into the performance of DNNs for HAR applications on mobile platforms in various configurations, including utilizing the phone’s CPU and DSP and offloading computation onto remote devices [333].”
  • This work demonstrates that mobile devices running DNN inference can scale gracefully across different compute resources available to the mobile platform.

    “This work demonstrates that mobile devices running DNN inference can scale gracefully across different compute resources available to the mobile platform”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. T. Plötz, et al. Feature learning for activity recognition in ubiquitous computing. In IJCAI '11.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lane, N. D., & Georgiev, P.
Affiliations
  • Microsoft Research Asia (China) (CN)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
Venue
Proceedings of the 16th International Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications
Publisher
ACM
Published
2015-02-12
Pages
117-122
ISSN
1550-6193 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1991539813
Cited by
282
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 6
FWCI
13.81
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications (WMCSA) (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing
Keywords
mobile sensing, deep learning, smartphones, wearable devices, context inference, user behavior inference, noisy sensor data

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review