Cited by 118Hate Speech and Cyberbullying DetectionSpam and Phishing DetectionSentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining

Cyberbullying Detection with a Pronunciation Based Convolutional Neural Network

Zhang, Xiang, Tong, Jonathan, Vishwamitra, Nishant, Whittaker, Elizabeth, Mazer, Joseph P., Kowalski, Robin, Hu, Hongxin, Luo, Feng +2 more·2016·2016 15th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA)

Abstract

Cyberbullying can have a deep and long lasting impact on its victims, who are often adolescents. Accurately detecting cyberbullying helps prevent it. However, the noise and errors in social media posts and messages make detecting cyberbullying very challenging. In this paper, we propose a novel pronunciation based convolutional neural network (PCNN) to address this challenge. Upon observing that the pronunciation of misspelled words in informal online conversations is often unchanged, we used the phoneme codes of the text as the features for a convolutional neural network. This procedure corrects spelling errors that did not alter the pronunciation, thereby alleviating the problem of noise and bullying data sparsity. To overcome class imbalance, a common problem in cyberbullying datasets, we implement three techniques that include threshold-moving, cost function adjusting, and a hybrid solution in our model. We evaluate the performance of our models using two cyberbullying datasets collected from Twitter and Formspring.me. The results of our experiment show that PCNN can achieve improved recall and precision compared to baseline convolutional neural networks.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icmla.2016.0132

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A few studies exploit RNN-based techniques (LSTM, BiLSTM, RNN) while some other studies use CNN-based techniques (CNN, PCNN, Char-CNNS) to detect cyberbullying from different sources.

    “A few studies [21,134] exploit RNN-based techniques, i.e., LSTM, BiLSTM, RNN, etc., while some other studies [5,137] use CNN-based techniques (i.e., CNN, PCNN, Char-CNNS, etc.) to detect cyberbullying from different sources.”

    From A Review on Deep-Learning-Based Cyberbullying Detection (2023) · cites this paper as [137]

  • Theano is heavily used in cyberbullying-related tasks.

    “Theano is another heavily used framework in cyberbullying-related tasks [137,170,171] due to its quick processing speed.”

    From A Review on Deep-Learning-Based Cyberbullying Detection (2023) · cites this paper as [137]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 27 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, X., Tong, J., Vishwamitra, N., Whittaker, E., Mazer, J. P., Kowalski, R., Hu, H., Luo, F., Macbeth, J., & Dillon, E.
Affiliations
  • Clemson University (US)
  • Fairfield University (US)
Venue
2016 15th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2016-12
Pages
740-745
OpenAlex
W2583149885
Cited by
118
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
3.00
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Spam and Phishing Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
Keywords
cyberbullying detection, phoneme features, spelling errors, spelling correction, class imbalance, social media text, Twitter

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review