Cited by 6Industrial Vision Systems and Defect DetectionImage and Object Detection TechniquesNon-Destructive Testing Techniques

Defects Detection of Cold-roll Steel Surface Based on MATLAB

Yichi, Zhang, Lv, Wu, Xuedong, Liu·2011·2011 Third International Conference on Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation

Abstract

The measure of detecting the surface edge information of cold-roll steel sheets has been investigated rely on the digital image processing toolbox of the mathematic software MATLAB, and the edge detecting experiment of surface grayscale image has been conducted on the computer. The method of detecting defects such as black flecks and scratching has been realized in the research, the different effect of operators with the disturbance of noise has been compared, the performance of the LOG's edge detection ability various due to the change of the parameter Sigma. Conclusions have been made that LOG operator maintains the satisfying performance with the disturbance of noise, smaller Sigma is, less satisfying the smoothing ability is, which maintains more details, whereas the smoothing ability is better with loss of more details, defects detection of cold-roll steel surface based on MATLAB has a quite satisfying performance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icmtma.2011.208

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • LoG with sigma = 2 provided a better segmentation result.

    “LoG with sigma =2 provided better segmentation result.”

    From Review of vision-based steel surface inspection systems (2014) · cites this paper as [52]

  • Six gradient operators (Sobel, Prewitt, Kirsch, Canny, Laplacian and Laplacian of Gaussian) in the spatial domain were tried and compared for a set of images of cold-rolled strips in [52].

    “Yichi et al. [52]: In an interesting experiment, six (Sobel, Prewitt, Kirsch, Canny, Laplacian and Laplacian of Gaussian (LoG)) gradient operators in spatial domain, using MATLAB, have been tried and compared for a set of images of cold-rolled strips.”

    From Review of vision-based steel surface inspection systems (2014) · cites this paper as [52]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yichi, Z., Lv, W., & Xuedong, L.
Affiliations
Wuhan University of Technology (CN)
Venue
2011 Third International Conference on Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2011-01
Pages
827-830
OpenAlex
W2145356027
Cited by
6
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 2
FWCI
1.85
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Conference on Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation (ICMTMA) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Object Detection Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
Keywords
cold-rolled steel, surface defect detection, edge detection, LOG operator, scratching behavior, noise robustness, sigma parameter, grayscale images, image smoothing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review