Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 232

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Neural net pruning-why and how

Sietsma, Dow·1988·IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks

Abstract

A continuing question in neural net research is the size of network needed to solve a particular problem. If training is started with too small a network for the problem no learning can occur. The researcher must then go through a slow process of deciding that no learning is taking place, increasing the size of the network and training again. If a network that is larger than required is used, then processing is slowed, particularly on a conventional von Neumann computer. An approach to this problem is discussed that is based on learning with a net which is larger than the minimum size network required to solve the problem and then pruning the solution network. The result is a small, efficient network that performs as well or better than the original which does not give a complete answer to the question, since the size of the initial network is still largely based on guesswork but it gives a very useful partial answer and sheds some light on the workings of a neural network in the process.>

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icnn.1988.23864

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 232

Metadata

Authors
Sietsma, & Dow
Venue
IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks
Publisher
IEEE
Published
1988
Pages
325-333 vol.1
ISSN
1098-7576 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1902150074
Cited by
232
References
0
FWCI
5.00
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neural net pruning-why and how. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/icnn.1988.23864
The paper
Sietsma, & Dow. (1988). Neural net pruning-why and how. IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks. https://doi.org/10.1109/icnn.1988.23864

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.