The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Long-Lived LoRa: Prolonging the Lifetime of a LoRa Network
Open accessAbstract
Prolonging the network lifetime is a major consideration in many Internet of Things applications. In this paper, we study maximizing the network lifetime of an energy-harvesting LoRa network. Such a network is characterized by heterogeneous recharging capabilities across the nodes that is not taken into account in existing work. We propose a link-layer protocol to achieve a long-lived LoRa network which dynamically enables the nodes with depleting batteries to exploit the superfluous energy of the neighboring nodes with affluent batteries by letting a depleting node offload its packets to an affluent node. By exploiting the LoRa's capability of adjusting multiple transmission parameters, we enable low-cost offloading by depleting nodes instead of high-cost direct forwarding. Such offloading requires synchronization of wake-up times as well as transmission parameters between the two nodes which also need to be selected dynamically. The proposed protocol addresses these challenges and prolongs the lifetime of a LoRa network through three novel techniques. (1) We propose a lightweight medium access control protocol for peer-to-peer communication to enable packet offloading which circumvents the synchronization overhead between the two nodes. (2) We propose an intuitive heuristic method for effective parameter selections for different modes (conventional vs. offloading). (3) We analyze the energy overhead of offloading and, based on it, the protocol dynamically selects affluent and depleting nodes while ensuring that an affluent node is not overwhelmed by the depleting ones. Simulations in NS-3 as well as real experiments show that our protocol can increase the network lifetime up to 4 times while maintaining the same throughput compared to traditional LoRa network.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“LoRa also adopts different authentication algorithms according to different network accesses [62].”
From A Survey of IoT Privacy Security: Architecture, Technology, Challenges, and Trends (2024) · cites this paper as [62]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 38
- 10.1109/JIOT.2019.2942776 · DOI
- wu, 2019, Distributed queueing based random access protocol for lora networks, IEEE Internet of Things Journal
- 10.1145/2994551.2994552 · DOI
- 10.1109/TNET.2018.2856197 · DOI
- 10.1145/3356250.3360024 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICNP.2019.8888038 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-981-15-3914-5_20 · DOI
- bor, 2016, Lora for the internet of things, Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Embedded Wireless Systems and Networks, 361
- 10.1109/IoTDI.2018.00033 · DOI
- 10.1145/3098822.3098845 · DOI
- 10.1109/IPSN.2018.00013 · DOI
- 10.1145/3302505.3310080 · DOI
- 10.1145/1031495.1031521 · DOI
- magrin, 2019, A thorough study of lorawan performance under different parameter settings, IEEE Internet of Things Journal
- 10.1007/978-3-030-32216-8_63 · DOI
- 10.1109/BigDataCongress.2016.63 · DOI
- shu, 2003, Wireless traffic modeling and prediction using seasonal arima models, ICC 2003-IEEE International Conference on Communications, 3, 1675, 10.1109/ICC.2003.1203886 · DOI
- 10.1109/INFCOM.2003.1209194 · DOI
- 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2859383 · DOI
- 10.1109/JIOT.2018.2839359 · DOI
- 10.1109/JIOT.2018.2815150 · DOI
- 10.3390/s18113718 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICDCS.2019.00083 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.comnet.2006.11.018 · DOI
- 10.1080/15435075.2018.1529593 · DOI
- 10.1109/RTSS.2014.35 · DOI
- 10.1109/COMST.2017.2652320 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/3131672.3131676 · DOI
- 10.1145/3170521.3170529 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41560-017-0032-9 · DOI
- mahmood, 2018, Scalability analysis of a lora network under imperfect orthogonality, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics
- 10.1109/NOMS.2018.8406255 · DOI
- 10.1109/WiMOB.2017.8115793 · DOI
- 10.1109/JIOT.2017.2768498 · DOI
- 10.1145/3341325.3342022 · DOI
- p j marcelis, 2017, DaRe: Data Recovery Through Application Layer Coding for LoRaWAN, 2017 IEEE/ACM Second International Conference on Internet-of-Things Design and Implementation (IoTDI), 97
- 10.1145/2988287.2989163 · DOI
- orfanidis, 2017, Investigating interference between lora and ieee 802.15. 4g networks, Wireless and Mobile Computing Networking and Communications (WiMob), 1
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Survey of IoT Privacy Security: Architecture, Technology, Challenges, and Trends
Sun, P., Shen, S., Wan, Y., Wu, Z., Fang, Z., & Gao, X.-Z. (2024) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2024.3372518 · Cited by 172
Metadata
- Authors
- Fahmida, S., Modekurthy, V. P., Rahman, M., Saifullah, A., & Brocanelli, M.
- Affiliations
- Wayne State University (US)
- Queens College, CUNY (US)
- Venue
- 2020 IEEE 28th International Conference on Network Protocols (ICNP)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2020-10-13
- Pages
- 1-12
- ISSN
- 1092-1648 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3051566641
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 5
- FWCI
- 8.09
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE International Conference on Network Protocols (ICNP) (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (2006467, 1846126, CAREER)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › IoT Networks and Protocols
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Energy Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Energy Harvesting in Wireless Networks
- Keywords
- LoRa, network lifetime, energy harvesting, medium access control, peer-to-peer communication, Internet of Things, energy-efficient routing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review